首页|危及器官自动分割几何指标对鼻咽癌患者放疗计划剂量变化的预测价值

危及器官自动分割几何指标对鼻咽癌患者放疗计划剂量变化的预测价值

扫码查看
目的 探讨危及器官(OAR)自动分割几何指标与剂量指标的相关关系,通过仿真实验研究几何指标变化对剂量指标的影响,以及预测剂量变化的可行性.方法 临床病例选择广州中医药大学金沙洲医院2023-01-01-2023-06-30共20例鼻咽癌患者影像资料进行回顾性分析.患者男13例,女7例;年龄38~74岁,中位年龄53.8岁.以高年资放疗医师勾画OAR为参考轮廓,并在其基础上优化生成参考计划.采用深度学习软件自动勾画的OAR作为替代轮廓,在此基础上以参考计划优化参数为模板,生成替代计划.统计参考与替代轮廓的戴斯相似性系数(DSC)和2组计划器官的剂量变化(△D),并计算DSC与△D Pearson相关系数r.仿真实验采用简单随机抽样方法选取1例鼻咽癌病例,CT图像模拟勾画1个倒U形靶区以及脊髓、腮腺和口腔等4个OAR.研究脊髓参考轮廓相对于靶区不同距离、轮廓的形状和体积及其相对于参考轮廓位置的变化剂量学影响.结果 临床病例脑干DSC均值最高为0.85,脊髓、腮腺和口腔DSC均值为0.78~0.82,视通路(视神经和视交叉)DSC均值为0.55且标准差较大.脑干最大剂量和左、右腮腺平均剂量参考与替代计划差异分别为(-1.26±1.65)、(0.99±1.60)和(0.72±2.54)Gy,差异均有统计学意义,t值分别为-4.700、3.818和1.831,P值分别为<0.001、<0.001和0.041.脑干DSC与计划肿瘤靶区均匀性指数、右腮腺DSC与计划靶区均匀性指数的|r|>0.4,呈中等相关,其余指标与△D相关系数均较小.仿真实验发现OAR轮廓形状、体积和位置均是影响剂量变化的特征,而OAR轮廓与靶区距离的减少,几何指标变化不一定会导致更大的剂量效应.结论 几何指标缺乏剂量预测特征,评估几何指标剂量效应时应将轮廓形状、体积和位置予以考虑.
Predictive value of automatic organs-at-risk segmentation geometric metrics for dose variation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy planning
Objective To explore the correlation between geometric segmentation metrics and dosimetric indicators of or-gans at risk(OAR),and to study the impact of geometric indicator changes on dose indicators through simulation experi-ments,as well as the feasibility of predicting dose variations.Methods A retrospective analysis of 20 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients were selected from January 01,2023 to June 30,2023 in Jinshazhou Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine.There were 13 males and 7 females.Age ranged from 38 to 74 years,with a median age of 53.8 years.Clinical experts delineated OARs as reference contours and optimized into reference plans,while deep learning software delineated OARs as alternative contours.Using the reference plan as a template and maintaining consistent planning pa-rameters,each corresponding alternative contour was re-optimized to form an alternative plan.The Dice similarity coeffi-cient(DSC)and organ delta dose(△D)of the contours of the reference and alternative two-group plans were statistically calculat-ed,and the Pearson correlation coefficient r between DSC and △D was calculated.Additionally,simulation experiments involved simple random sampling of a nasopharyngeal carcinoma CT image to simulate the delineation of a U-shaped target and four OARs:the spinal cord,parotid glands,and oral cavity.The study focused on assessing the dosimetric impact of different distances,the shape and volume of the spinal cord contour relative to the target contour,and changes in its posi-tion relative to reference contour.Results In clinical case,the DSC for the brainstem reached 0.85,while the DSC for the parotid glands and oral cavity was 0.78-0.80.The DSC for the visual pathway(optic nerve and optic chiasm)had an average of 0.55 with a significant standard deviation.The mean and standard range between the reference and alternative plan for the brainstem maximum dose and the left and right parotid gland mean dose were(-1.26±1.65),(0.99±1.60)and(0.72±2.54)Gy respectively,with a statistically significant difference(t values were-4.700,3.818 and 1.831,P values were<0.001,<0.001 and 0.041).The correlation coefficients between brainstem DSC and PGTV homogeneity index,and between the right parotid gland DSC and PTV homogeneity index were|r|>0.4,indicating a moderate correlation,and the correlation coefficients between other metrics and △D were all small.The simulation experi-ments found that the shape,volume,and position of the OAR contours were all characteristics affecting dose variations.H owever,a reduction in the distance between the OAR contour and the target area did not necessarily lead to a greater dose effect.Conclusions Geometric metrics lack dose prediction features.When evaluating dose effects of geometric met-rics,the shape,size,and location of contours must be carefully considered.

nasopharyngeal carcinomaorgans at riskautomatic segmentationsegmentation metricdosimetric metric

胡金炎、张丽媛、魏夏平、代智涛

展开 >

广州中医药大学金沙洲医院肿瘤放射治疗中心,广东广州 510168

中国医学科学院肿瘤医院深圳医院放疗科,广东 深圳 518116

鼻咽癌 危及器官 自动勾画 分割指标 剂量指标

深圳市出站博士后科研资助

25005

2024

中华肿瘤防治杂志
中华预防医学会 山东省肿瘤防治研究院

中华肿瘤防治杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.292
ISSN:1673-5269
年,卷(期):2024.31(19)