摘要
在与民营经济相关的刑事案件诉讼中,诉讼制度不完善所带来的司法风险仍广泛存在.尤其是在刑事诉讼审前阶段,立案管辖不合理、强制性措施的使用不符合比例原则、嫌疑人缺乏救济性权利、检察监督缺乏刚性等问题集中出现.基于刑事诉讼法的立法任务、恢复性司法理念以及宽严相济刑事政策的共同要求,加强对民营企业构建以检察机关为中心的刑事审前保护机制尤为必要.这一方面源于审前保护的迫切需求,另一方面也是检察机关作为审前主导的角色使然.立案环节应完善公安机关刑事立案制度、保障涉案人员权利、强化检察机关的立案监督;侦查阶段应优先考虑适用对人、对物限制程度较弱的强制措施,并加强对于强制性措施的必要性审查;起诉阶段应以认罪认罚从宽制度为基础,积极探索不起诉制度在民营企业案件中的灵活运用.
Abstract
In criminal cases related to the private economy,the judicial risks brought by the imperfect litigation system still exist widely.Especially in the pretrial stage of criminal proceedings,problems such as unreasonable jurisdiction,non proportionality in the use of mandatory measures,lack of remedial rights for suspects,and lack of rigidity in prosecutorial supervision are concentrated.Based on the legislative tasks of the Criminal Procedure Law,the concept of restorative justice,and the common requirements of the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity,it is particularly necessary to strengthen the construction of a criminal pretrial pro-tection mechanism centered on the procuratorial organs for private enterprises.On the one hand,this is due to the urgent need for pre-trial protection,and on the other hand,it is also due to the leading role of the procuratorial organs as pretrial leaders.Specifically,the filing process should improve the criminal filing system of the public security organs,safeguard the rights of personnel involved,and strengthen the supervision of the procuratorial organs in filing cases;during the investigation stage,priority should be given to the ap-plication of mandatory measures with weaker restrictions on individuals and objects,and the necessity of mandatory measures should be strengthened;the prosecution stage should be based on the lenient system of confession and punishment,and actively explore the flexi-ble application of the non prosecution system in private enterprise cases.
基金项目
最高人民法院重大课题(2020)(ZGFYZD-KT202002)
维普
万方数据