首页|排斥亦或融通:公共行政研究的政治学化反思及其出路

排斥亦或融通:公共行政研究的政治学化反思及其出路

"Exclusion or Inclusion",A Political Reflection on the Politicization of Public Administration Research and Pathways to Harmony

扫码查看
政治—行政二分法的理论思想奠定了公共行政的独立学科地位,逐渐推进公共行政研究的科学化.对于公共行政的研究越来越多结合政治学研究领域,由此引起众多专家学者的争议,公共行政与政治学研究该不该相互排斥,还是两个学科之间相互借鉴?当下已然建立起具有中国特色的公共行政学科体系,对于公共行政、政治学的相关研究不能单纯从逻辑经验主义的角度进行分析,要将其放在理论发展历史、时代的背景中等考察.这两个学科未来发展呈现出行、政一体化的趋势,有助于两个学科之间理论与方法融通互补.
The theory of political-administrative dichotomy has firmly established public administration as an autonomous disci-pline,significantly advancing scientific inquiry in this field.However,increasing integration of public administration research with the field of political science has sparked considerable controversy among numerous experts and scholars.The debate centers on whether re-search in public administration and political science should be mutually exclusive or if there should be mutual borrowing and collabora-tion between the two disciplines.At present,a discipline system of public administration with Chinese characteristics has been estab-lished,relevant research of public administration and political science should be investigated in the background of theoretical develop-ment history and times,rather than simply from the perspective of logical empiricism.In the future,research and development of these two disciplines will show a trend of integration of public adminstration and politics,ensure the theoretical and methodological integration and complementarity between the two disciplines.

public administration,political science,integration of administration and administrationexclusionintegration and complementarity

何玲玲、龚崇清

展开 >

南宁师范大学 经济与管理学院,广西 南宁 530022

公共行政 政治学化 行政一体化 排斥性 融通互补

2024

齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
齐齐哈尔大学

齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.237
ISSN:1008-2638
年,卷(期):2024.(3)
  • 19