新发展格局下市场一体化动态驱动路径研究——基于4D框架的多时段定性比较分析
Dynamic Driving Path of Market Integration Under the New Development Pattern:A Multi-time Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on the 4D Framework
赵政楠 1茹少峰 2成依阳1
作者信息
- 1. 西北大学经济管理学院,西安 710127
- 2. 西北大学经济管理学院,西安 710127;西北大学中国西部经济发展研究院,西安 710127
- 折叠
摘要
基于密度、距离、整合与创新差异的4D理论框架,采用相对价格法与熵权-TOPSIS法测度市场一体化程度,并通过多时段定性比较分析方法研究市场一体化的动态驱动路径.研究发现:①市场一体化的驱动路径具有多重并发与殊途同归特征,任何单一要素均不是驱动市场一体化的必要条件;②存在综合发展型、规模-环境-创新协同型、环境-创新驱动型和基建-环境驱动型等4类市场一体化的驱动路径,且综合发展型路径是各阶段的关键驱动路径,其核心条件均为经济密度、知识溢出与科技创新;③不同市场类型一体化的驱动路径均以综合发展型路径为主,但路径构成上存在显著差异.
Abstract
Based on the4D theoretical framework of density,distance,integration,and innovation difference,the relative price method and the entropy-weighted TOPSIS method are used to measure the degree of market integration,and the dynamic driving path of market integration is studied through multi-time qualitative comparative analysis method.The results show that:①The driving path of market integration has the characteristics of multiple concurrency and different paths,and any sin-gle element is not a necessary condition for driving market integration.②There are four types of market integration driving paths,such as comprehensive development,scale-environment-innovation synergy,environment-innovation-driven and infrastructure-environment-driven.The comprehensive development path is the key driving path at each stage,and its core conditions are economic density,knowledge spillover,and scientific and technological innovation.③The driving path of integration of different market types is mainly the comprehensive development path,but there are significant differences in the composition of the path.
关键词
市场一体化/4D框架/熵权-TOPSIS法/多时段定性比较分析Key words
market integration/4D framework/entropy-weighted TOPSIS method/multi-time Qualitative Comparative Analysis引用本文复制引用
基金项目
教育部人文社会科学一般项目(16YJA790041)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据