摘要
我国民事立法层面尚未做好将"性自主权"明确列入一般人格权范畴的理论准备.在处理日益增多的"性自主权"侵权纠纷中,法院在审判过程中确认"性自主权"的权利属性时出现了司法偏差.这就需要从"性自主权"概念和属性的法理辨析中明确其人格权本质,从法教义学角度实现"性自主权"一般人格权抑或其他人格权益的权利证成,进而为法院"据法裁判"提供理论依托.通过对"性自主权"侵权情形的划分和归类,明晰侵犯"性自主权"的构成要件和基本特征;通过梳理民事诉讼以及刑事附带民事诉讼中侵犯"性自主权"的法律规范,明确侵犯"性自主权",尤其是在刑民交叉案件中的责任认定、救济措施以及存在的规制漏洞.在此基础上,厘清因侵犯"性自主权"提起精神损害赔偿的法律依据、认定机制和赔偿标准.
Abstract
At the legislative level in China,there has been insufficient theoretical prepara-tion to explicitly include"sexual autonomy"within the scope of general personality rights.In handling the increasing number of disputes related to violations of"sexual autonomy,"judicial biases have emerged during the trial process when courts determine the nature of the right to"sexual autonomy".This situation necessitates a clear legal analysis of the concept and attrib-utes of"sexual autonomy"to establish its essential nature as a personality right,and,from the perspective of legal doctrine,enable the justification of the right to"sexual autonomy"as either a general personality right or other personality interests,thereby providing theoretical support for courts to"adjudicate according to law".By delineating and categorizing instances of violations of"sexual autonomy,"the constitutive elements and fundamental characteristics of such violations can be clarified.By examining the legal norms governing civil litigation and civil litigation associated with criminal cases concerning violations of"sexual autonomy,"the responsibility determination,remedies,and existing regulatory loopholes regarding violations of"sexual autonomy,"especially in cases involving both criminal and civil matters,can be defined.Based on this foundation,the legal basis,determination mechanism,and compensa-tion standards for claiming compensation for mental damages resulting from violations of"sex-ual autonomy"can be elucidated.
NETL
NSTL
万方数据