首页|重审利奥塔的后现代智术

重审利奥塔的后现代智术

Rethinking Jean-Francois Lyotard's Postmodern Sophistry

扫码查看
学界对利奥塔的关注,大多仅聚焦于后现代主义哲学家这个标签,这有所偏颇.从虚无主义和智者派两个要点对利奥塔思想发展进行某种贯穿性的理解,我们发现,利奥塔自己的虚无主义大致经历了从相对之还原向绝对之深渊的转变,并可概括为虚无、事件、体验等关键要点.这也为我们重释《后现代状态》和《异识》等代表作提供了重要线索.而利奥塔由此得出的"无标准之判断"这个基本思路也就在很大程度上突破了康德的第三批判的范式,进而与智者、异教主义这些看似边缘而极端的思想运动产生了密切关联.反转、计谋、时机等等,这些古老的智术不断被利奥塔转用于当下的后现代世界之中,成为哲学判断的有力契机.
Most of the attention paid by the academic community to Jean-Francois Lyotard is focused on his label of postmodern philosopher,which is biased.This article attempts to provide a new understanding of the development of his thoughts from the two key points of nihilism and the Sophists.First of all,nihilism is not just a social trend or a life creed,but has a long tradition in the history of Western thought,and is mainly related to the key themes of"nothingness"and negativity.Therefore,nihilism can be further divided into two basic forms:reduction and the absolute.Lyotard's own nihilism has roughly experienced a transformation from relative reduction to absolute abyss,and can be summarized as key points such as nothingness,events,and experience.This is also the fundamental difference between his and Nietzsche's classic definition of nihilism.Therefore,this also provides us with useful clues for reinterpreting many of Lyotard's representative works.The disputes and transformations between heterogeneous language games in La Condition Postmoderne and the in-depth elaboration of"silence"and"dommage"in Le Différend are all concentrated manifestations of his absolute and abyssal nihilism.But this also leads to two further questions:Based on the background of negativity,how can we make positive judgments?What kind of subject of thinking and action can be shaped by such judgments?For the first question,Lyotard derived the basic idea of"judgment without criteria"through his reinterpretation of Kant.This has largely broken through the paradigm of Kant's third critique,and further demonstrated the absolutely negative feature of creation"out of nothing."For the second question,the close connection between Lyotard and the Sophists is more worthy of attention.In La Condition Postmoderne,the question of"who is judging"has already been highlighted,and in works such as Moralités postmodernes,"L'anima minima"and its traumatic experience have often become the focus of discussion.But the most representative and summary response he gave is the dialogue collection Just Gaming.Here,Lyotard not only combines the background of Western intellectual history and carefully analyzes the many characteristics of the so-called"paganism"represented by the Sophists,but also brings these historical resources back to the current reality,trying to restart the potential for critical reflection and positive action contained therein.The seemingly ancient wisdom techniques,such as reTorsion,ruse,kairos,and so on,are reborn again and may become a powerful opportunity for philosophical judgment in the postmodern era.

Jean-Francois LyotardPost-modernismWisdom techniquesNihilismJudgementLe différend

姜宇辉

展开 >

华东师范大学政治与国际关系学院(上海 200241)

利奥塔 后现代 智术 虚无主义 判断 异识

2025

四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
四川大学

四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

北大核心
影响因子:0.832
ISSN:1006-0766
年,卷(期):2025.(1)