首页|功能主义视野下窃取虚拟货币行为的刑法定性

功能主义视野下窃取虚拟货币行为的刑法定性

扫码查看
关于窃取虚拟货币行为刑法定性,学界主要存在"数据犯罪说"与"财产犯罪说"两种主张.两种主张涉及的焦点问题是虚拟货币是否属于刑法中的财物,论者具体围绕虚拟货币的合法性与价值性问题展开探讨.在功能主义的刑法解释观和目的理性的刑法体系视野下,对虚拟货币财产属性的认识,无需在合法性与价值性问题上过度纠缠,而应在合目的的考量下,对虚拟货币是否具有作为财产保护的必要性展开分析.虚拟货币虽没有物理实体,但权利人可通过私钥对其实现支配.虚拟货币可成为占有的对象,窃取虚拟货币的行为应以盗窃罪论处.
Criminal Law Characterization of Stealing Virtual Currency from the Perspective of Functionalism
Regarding the characterization of the criminal law of stealing virtual currency,there are two main propositions in the academic community:"data crime theory"and"property crime theory".The focus of the two proposi-tions is whether virtual currency is property under the criminal law,and the commentators specifically discuss the le-gality and value of virtual currency.Under the functionalist view of criminal law interpretation and the perspective of the criminal law system of purposive rationality,the recognition of the property attributes of virtual currency does not need to be excessively entangled in the issues of legality and value,but should be analyzed under the consideration of purposefulness to analyze whether virtual currency has the necessity of property protection.Although there is no physi-cal entity of virtual currency,the right holder can control it through the private key.Virtual currency can be the object of possession,and the act of stealing virtual currency should be punished as the crime of theft.

virtual currencyburglaryfunctionalist view of criminal law interpretationdefacto possessionnor-mative possession

罗树志、那晓燕

展开 >

中南大学法学院

虚拟货币 盗窃罪 功能主义刑法解释观 事实性占有 规范性占有

2024

四川警察学院学报
四川警察学院

四川警察学院学报

影响因子:0.222
ISSN:1674-5612
年,卷(期):2024.36(4)