检察公益诉讼与个体维权之成本与收益比较视角下地理标志保护路径的选择
The Choice of Geographical Indications Protection Path from the Perspective of the Comparison of Costs and Benefits between Public Interest Litigation and Individual Rights Protection
郭高 1叶丽雯 2周霞2
作者信息
- 1. 四川天府新区人民检察院第三检察部
- 2. 四川天府新区人民检察院
- 折叠
摘要
2022年3月,最高人民检察院印发的《关于全面加强新时代知识产权检察工作的意见》为检察机关在地理标志保护领域开展公益诉讼提供了依据.地理标志保护的个体维权存在不足,而通过检察公益诉讼保护地理标志,成本更低,收益更大,比个体维权更具优势和正当性.检察机关应综合利用多种手段,进一步完善地理标志保护检察公益诉讼制度,降低制度运行成本、增加制度运行收益,以获得更多社会利益.
Abstract
In March 2022,the Supreme People's Procuratorate issued Opinions on Comprehensively Strengthening Intellectual Property Procuratorial Work in the New Era,which provided a basis for procuratorial organs to carry out public interest litigation in the field of geographical indication protection.There are deficiencies in individual rights pro-tection of geographical indications,while the protection of geographical indications through procuratorial public interest litigation has lower cost and greater benefits,which is more advantageous and legitimate than individual rights protec-tion.The procuratorial organs should make comprehensive use of various means to further improve the procuratorial pub-lic interest litigation system for the protection of geographical indications,reduce the operating costs of the system,in-crease the operating benefits of the system,and obtain more social benefits.
关键词
地理标志/检察公益诉讼/个体维权/边际成本/边际收益Key words
geographical indication/prosecutorial public interest litigation/individual rights protect/marginal cost/marginal revenue引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据