首页|天府与双流机场2022年1月9日辐射雾特征对比分析

天府与双流机场2022年1月9日辐射雾特征对比分析

扫码查看
为了探究天府与双流机场辐射雾气象特征异同,本文利用自动气象观测系统数据、机场人工观测数据及ERA5再分析数据,对 2022年 1月 9日辐射雾过程两机场的气象特征进行对比分析.结果表明:双流机场的基础温度略低,湿度条件稍好,前期有明显逆温层形成,起雾时间偏早;辐射雾过程后期,双流机场受低云影响气温上升,升温幅度较大,近地面一直为水汽通量辐散,没有水汽补充,同时 02R跑道端 04:00后风速明显增大,扰动加强,不利于雾的维持.天府机场的升温幅度较双流小,且近地面维持水汽通量辐合,有水汽补充,同时风力也较弱,有利于雾的维持.
Comparative Analysis of Characteristics of Radiation Fog at Tianfu and Shuangliu Airports on January 9,2022
In order to explore the similarities and differences in the meteorological characteristics of radiation fog between Tianfu and Shuangliu airports,the meteorological characteristics of the radiation fog on January 9,2022 at both airports were compared by using the data of automatic meteorological observation system,airport manual observation data and ERA5 reanalysis data.The rusults show that the basic temperature at Shuangliu Airport was slightly lower,with better humidity condition,and a significant inversion layer formed in the early stage,leading to an earlier fog formation.During the later stages of the radiation fog process,the temperature rose due to the influ-ence of low clouds at Shuangliu Airport,and the temperature rise range was large.The near-surface water vapor flux diverged and there was no water vapor supplement.At the same time,the wind speed at the end of the 02R runway increased significantly after 04:00,and the disturbance was strengthened,which was not conducive to the maintenance of fog.The temperature rise of Tianfu Airport was smaller than that of Shuangliu,and the water vapor flux convergence was maintained near the ground,with water vapor replenishment,and the wind was also weak,which was conducive to the maintenance of fog.

AirportRadiation fogPhysical quantity diagnosisComparative analysis

吴妮晏、赵清越

展开 >

民航西南空管局,成都 610202

机场 辐射雾 物理量诊断 对比分析

2024

高原山地气象研究
中国气象局成都高原气象研究所 中国气象学会高原气象学委员会

高原山地气象研究

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.313
ISSN:1674-2184
年,卷(期):2024.44(4)