The three major journal evaluation projects all focus on evaluating the influence of journals.They have gone through the development process from documentation metrology research to journal evaluation and final-ly to academic evaluation.Although they differ in evaluation purposes,evaluation indicators,and other as-pects,their selection results show a tendency to converge.Faced with the impact of journal evaluation,the journal community should maintain the original intention of publishing with a calm and peaceful attitude,ab-sorb journal evaluation data feedback while adhering to the principle of independent journal publication,and serve the purpose of publishing good journals.Academic community should abandon the simplistic academic e-valuation idea of"evaluating papers based on journals",respect the laws of academic research,follow the e-valuation principle of combining subjectivity and objectivity,and establish a relatively independent and scien-tific evaluation system.
NETL
NSTL
维普
万方数据
