首页|布兰顿与黑格尔论概念及其规范性

布兰顿与黑格尔论概念及其规范性

Brandon's Interpretation of Hegel's Concepts and Normativity

扫码查看
随着《信任的精神》的出版,布兰顿建立了"分析哲学的黑格尔阶段".他将黑格尔的"精神现象学"解读为"语义学",并认为黑格尔完成了那个源自康德并历经塞拉斯的"规范性转向".但布兰顿的解读引起了很大的争议,诸多黑格尔专家对其进行了尖锐的批评,普遍认为他误解了黑格尔的本意.在该书的核心内容即概念本质及其规范性的问题上,布兰顿与黑格尔有着非常显著的差异:布兰顿理解的概念既有内容的维度,也有表征的维度,还是一种我们在推理实践中掌握的能力;而黑格尔理解的概念却含有理性认识的基本单位、事物和思维的自我运动及其展开状态等丰富含义.布兰顿对黑格尔的解读虽然并不完全忠实于黑格尔哲学的本意,但这种创造性诠释却为分析哲学带来了新的可能.这一诠释若能进一步采纳批评意见,或许就能形成更加完善和辩证的语言哲学.
With the publication of A Spirit of Trust,Brandon established the Hegelian stage of analytic philoso-phy.He interpreted Hegel's phenomenology of spirit(Die Phanomenologie des Geistes)as semantics and believed that Hegel completed the normativity turn that originated from Kant and went through Sellars.However,Brandon's interpretation has sparked considerable controversy,with many Hegel experts offer-ing sharp criticisms,generally arguing that he misunderstood Hegel's original intention.As to the central content of the book,namely the essence of concepts and their normativity,Brandon and Hegel have signif-icant differences:Brandon's understanding of concepts includes both a dimension of content and a dimen-sion of representation,as well as an ability one grasp in one's practice of reasoning;while Hegel's under-standing of concepts contains rich meanings such as the basic unit of rational cognition,the self-movement of things and thoughts,and their unfolding states.Although Brandon's interpretation of Hegel is not en-tirely faithful to the true essence of Hegel's philosophy,his creative interpretation has brought new possi-bilities to analytic philosophy.It may lead to a more comprehensive and dialectical philosophy of language if further criticisms were embraced.

王鹏

展开 >

四川师范大学哲学学院

布兰顿 黑格尔 语义学 概念 规范性

国家社科基金后期资助项目

20FZXB002

2024

四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)
四川师范大学

四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.64
ISSN:1000-5315
年,卷(期):2024.51(2)
  • 51