四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)2024,Vol.51Issue(2) :154-160.DOI:10.13734/j.cnki.1000-5315.2024.0607

一流本科专业建设点遴选机制优化及建设成效评估思考——以汉语国际教育专业为例

Optimization of the Selection Mechanism for First-Class Undergraduate Major Construction Sites and Evaluation of Construction Results:A Case Study of Chi-nese International Education Major

龚漫
四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)2024,Vol.51Issue(2) :154-160.DOI:10.13734/j.cnki.1000-5315.2024.0607

一流本科专业建设点遴选机制优化及建设成效评估思考——以汉语国际教育专业为例

Optimization of the Selection Mechanism for First-Class Undergraduate Major Construction Sites and Evaluation of Construction Results:A Case Study of Chi-nese International Education Major

龚漫1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 中央民族大学国际教育学院
  • 折叠

摘要

一流本科专业建设点遴选机制和建设成效评估是影响"双万计划"能否达到提升高校本科人才培养能力和质量预期目标的重要因素.以汉语国际教育专业为例,对一流本科专业建设点遴选机制进行研究后发现:其遴选标准笼统,实际操作中难以把握;分"赛道"建设与突出示范领跑两条建设原则存在矛盾;评审机制存在不足.优化遴选机制可有三条路径:一是明确关键指标,建立各专业建设点的遴选标准;二是分"赛道"择优改为统一标准择优;三是将"一次性大同行"会议评审改为"匿名通讯+小同行"会议评审.为提高建设成效评估的科学性,建议延长一流本科专业建设周期,构建以人才培养质量和特色为评估重点的"双核心"建设成效评估体系.

Abstract

The optimization of the selection mechanism for first-class undergraduate major construction sites and the evaluation of construction results are critical factors influencing whether the"Double First-Class Initia-tive"can achieve the expected goals of enhancing the talent cultivation capacity and quality of undergradu-ate education in universities.Taking the Chinese International Education major as an example,a study on the selection mechanism for first-class undergraduate major construction sites reveals several key findings:the selection criteria are too general,making it difficult to implement in practice;there is a contradiction between the principles of"track-based"construction and exemplary leadership;and deficiencies exist in the evaluation mechanism.Three possible pathways for optimizing the selection mechanism are proposed:firstly,clarifying key indicators and establishing selection criteria for each major construction site;second-ly,transitioning from selecting based on different"tracks"to a unified standard selection process;and thirdly,replacing the traditional review process from one-time peer evaluation to anonymous communica-tion review together with peer evaluation To enhance the scientific assessment of construction effective-ness,it is recommended to extend the construction period of first-class undergraduate majors and establish a dual-core evaluation system focusing on talent cultivation quality and characteristics.

关键词

"双万计划"/遴选机制/建设成效评估/汉语国际教育/一流本科专业

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

国家社会科学基金2017年度重大招标项目(17ZDA306)

出版年

2024
四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)
四川师范大学

四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.64
ISSN:1000-5315
参考文献量30
段落导航相关论文