首页|现代化的两种方案及其得失

现代化的两种方案及其得失

Two Approaches of Modernization and Their Gains and Losses

扫码查看
现代化是一个复杂的词汇,它既用于界定 15 世纪以来社会变迁的特定状态,又用于展现一种合于人类期望的发展性价值观念,因此成为人类追逐的世间理想.这样的理念,促成了务实改进社会的原生现代化与实现理想目标的批判现代化两种现代化模式.两种方案,都追求社会的发展.相比而言,前者在承认社会总存在不足的前提条件下,尽力寻求财富的增长、福利的改善与公益的增进;后者则认为社会是可以从根本上重建的,因此希望超越具有缺陷的现代化发展模式,一并解决物质财富增长、福利提升与人性升华的社会问题.前者所取得的现代化成就,成为可借鉴的社会发展模式;后者所尝试的现代化跃升,常常导致社会进步的曲折发展.这是致力追求实现现代化目标的国家,需要审慎分辨、理性选择的现代化不同进路.
Modernization is a complex term,used both to define a specific state of social change since the 15th century,rather than the lofty goals of human ideals,and to demonstrate a developmental value concept in line with human expectations,thus becoming an earthly ideal pursued by humanity.This notion has led to two modernization models:native modernization aimed at pragmatic improvement of society and critical modernization aimed at realizing ideal goals.Both approaches pursue social development.In comparison,the former,under the premise of acknowledging the inherent deficiencies in society,endeavors to seek wealth growth,welfare improvement,and public welfare enhancement;while the latter believes that society can be fundamentally rebuilt,thus aiming to transcend flawed modernization development models and solve social problems such as material wealth growth,welfare enhancement,and human nature upliftment.The modernization achievements of the former become replicable social development models;however,the attempts of the latter to leapfrog modernization often lead to the twists and turns of social progress.Thus,for countries committed to achieving modernization goals,it is necessary to carefully distinguish and rationally choose different paths to modernization.

任剑涛

展开 >

清华大学社会科学学院政治学系

现代化 批判现代化 社会发展

清华大学自主科研项目

20235080028

2024

四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)
四川师范大学

四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.64
ISSN:1000-5315
年,卷(期):2024.51(3)
  • 28