首页|不同剂量瑞马唑仑用于骶管阻滞痔疮切除术患者的效果比较

不同剂量瑞马唑仑用于骶管阻滞痔疮切除术患者的效果比较

扫码查看
目的:比较不同剂量瑞马唑仑用于骶管阻滞痔疮切除患者的效果。方法:选取 2022年 1月—2023年 1月济南市槐荫人民医院收治的 200例拟行痔疮切除术患者为研究对象,随机将其分为丙泊酚组(P组)、瑞马唑仑低剂量组(R1组)、瑞马唑仑中剂量组(R2组)及瑞马唑仑高剂量组(R3组)四组,各 50例。所有患者均在B超引导下完成骶管麻醉,P组先静脉推注丙泊酚 2 mg/kg,再泵注丙泊酚 5 mg/(kg·h),R 1、R 2、R 3组先静脉推注瑞马唑仑 0。05 mg/kg,再分别泵注瑞马唑仑 3、4、5 μg/(kg·min)。比较四组镇静起效时间、补救次数、苏醒时间及并发症发生情况。结果:R 1组镇静起效时间长于R2、R3组,短于P组,补救次数多于P、R 2、R 3组,苏醒时间短于P、R 2、R 3组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05)。镇静药物使用前时,四组脑电双频指数(BIS)值和改良警觉/镇静(MOAA/S)评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0。05);镇静药物使用后、镇静后 15 min、手术结束时,R 1组BIS值、MOAA/S评分均高于P、R 2、R 3组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05)。R 1、R 2、R 3组不良事件发生率分别为 0。00%、4。00%、26。00%,均低于P组的 64。00%,且R1组低于R2、R3组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论:低剂量瑞马唑仑用于骶管阻滞痔疮切除术患者,清醒镇静效果优于高剂量瑞马唑仑,可缩短术后苏醒时间、减少不良事件发生情况,但麻醉起效时间相对较长,临床需结合患者情况进行选择。
Comparison of Effects of Different Doses of Remazolam on Patients with Sacral Canal Block Hemorrhoidectomy
Objective:To compare the effects of different doses of Remazolam on patients with sacral canal block hemorrhoidectomy.Methods:A total of 200 patients with sacral canal block hemorrhoidectomy who were admitted to Huaiyin People's Hospital of Jinan from January 2022 to January 2023 were selected as the study objects and randomly divided into a propofol group(group P),a remazolam low dose group(group R1),a remazolam medium dose group(group R2)and a remazolam high dose group(group R3),with 50 cases in each group.All patients underwent sacral canal blank anesthesia under B-ultrasound guidance.Group P received 2 mg/kg of propofol,followed by 5 mg/(kg·h)of propofol;groups R1,R2 and R3 received 0.05 mg/kg of remazolam,followed by 3,4 and 5 μg/(kg·min)of remazolam,respectively.The time of sedation onset,the number of remedies,the time of recovery and the occurrence of complications were compared among the four groups.Results:The onset time of sedation in R1 group was longer than that in R2 and R3 groups and shorter than that in P group,the number of remedies was higher than that in P,R2 and R3 groups,and the recovery time was shorter than that in P,R2 and R3 groups,with statistical significance(P<0.05).Before the sedative is administered,there were no significant differences in BIS and MOAA/S scores among the four groups(P>0.05).After the use of sedative drugs,15 minutes after sedation,and at the end of surgery,the BIS value and MOAA/S score of group R1 were higher than those of groups P,R2 and R3,with statistical significance(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse events in R1,R2 and R3 groups was 0.00%,4.00%and 26.00%,respectively,which were lower than 64.00%in P group,and the R1 group was lower than R2 and R3 groups with statistical significance(P<0.05).Conclusion:The sober sedation effect of lower dose remazolam in patients with sacral canal block hemorrhoidectomy is higher than that of higher dose remazolam,which can shorten the postoperative recovery time and reduce the occurrence of adverse events.However,the effective time of anesthesia is relatively long,and clinical selection should be based on the patient's situation.

HemorrhoidectomySacral canal blockRemazolamConscious sedation

杨茹、陈丽丽

展开 >

山东省济南市槐荫人民医院麻醉疼痛科,山东 济南 250000

痔疮切除术 骶管阻滞 瑞马唑仑 清醒镇静

2024

中国伤残医学
中国康复医学会,黑龙江省截瘫研究所

中国伤残医学

影响因子:0.451
ISSN:1673-6567
年,卷(期):2024.32(20)