首页|论正当防卫之限度条件

论正当防卫之限度条件

扫码查看
2016 于欢案,使得正当防卫制度在刑法的实务和理论界产生轩然大波.虽然最终于欢被认定为防卫过当,但部分学者认为应当适当扩张正当防卫之限度条件,让人民群众能够积极地行使防卫权,保护自身合法权益,打击正在进行的不法侵害.2018 年的"于海明案"承接"于欢案",在此案以后,实务上开始涌现出大量认定为正当防卫的案件.笔者发现正当防卫之限度条件的传统学说似乎仍然未将防卫限度的标准具体化.本文将适用宪法与行政法的理论知识,将比例原则作为检验标准,结合具体的案件进行分析,意图提供一个将理论和实务相结合的折中方案.
On the Limits and Conditions of Justifiable Defense
Since the"Yu Huan case"in 2016,there have been different opinions in the field of criminal law theory and practice on the issue of the limit of legitimate defense.Although Yu Huan was ultimately found to have exceeded the limit of legitimate defense,some scholars believe that the conditions for legitimate defense should be appropriately expanded to enable the people to actively exercise their right to defense,protect their legitimate rights and interests,and combat ongoing illegal infringements.Following the"Yu Huan case",the"Yu Haiming case"in 2018 continued this discussion,and a large number of cases began to be recognized as legitimate defense in practice.The author found that the traditional doctrine of the limit of legitimate defense still did not concretize the standard for defense limits.This article will apply constitutional theory knowledge and use the proportionality principle as a test model,combined with specific cases for argumentative analysis,intending to provide a compromise solution that combines theory and practice.

justifiable defenselimit conditionsproportion principle

张桓荣

展开 >

澳门科技大学 法学院,澳门 嘉模堂 999078

正当防卫 限度条件 比例原则

2024

四川职业技术学院学报
四川职业技术学院

四川职业技术学院学报

影响因子:0.308
ISSN:1672-2094
年,卷(期):2024.34(2)
  • 9