首页|"套路贷"刑事案件罪名认定困境及其应对研究

"套路贷"刑事案件罪名认定困境及其应对研究

Research on Judicial Practice of Routine Loan Crime Case

扫码查看
我国刑法并没有针对"套路贷"的明确规定,其并非严格意义上的法律概念,它只是司法实践中对部分新型"侵财类"犯罪行为特征的概括性评价,如何对其进行准确评价、合理界定和有效规制仍处于初期研讨阶段."套路贷"犯罪往往与涉黑犯罪交织,具有罪名基本固定、犯罪行为手段多样、社会危害性大等特点.当前学界和实务界对"套路贷"刑事案件司法认定问题存在诸多争议,主要表现在罪与非罪、罪名认定、财产认定和依法打击等方面.通过对近两年"套路贷"犯罪现状进行实证分析,对司法适用过程中罪与非罪、罪名认定、犯罪数额认定提出对策建议.
There is no clear provision in China's Criminal Law for"loan arbitrage",which is not a strict legal concept.It is only a summary evaluation of the characteristics of some new types of"financial invasion"criminal behaviors in judicial practice.How to accurately evaluate,reasonably define,and effectively regulate them is still in the early stage of discussion.The crime of"loan scams"is often intertwined with crimes committed by black and evil forces,with characteristics such as fixed charges,diverse means of criminal behavior,and high social harm.There are many controversies in the current academic and practical circles regarding the judicial determination of criminal cases related to"loan fraud",mainly manifested in the aspects of crime and non crime,charge determination,property determination,and legal crackdown.Through empirical analysis of the current situation of"loan arbitrage"crimes in the past two years,propose countermeasures and suggestions for the determination of crime and non crime,charge determination,and crime amount in the judicial application process.

routine loanprivate lendingcombat and root out organized crimejudicial practicecriminal case

郭哲、汤亮

展开 >

湖南大学法学院,湖南长沙 410082

湖南省人民检察院,湖南长沙 410001

套路贷 民间借贷 扫黑除恶 司法实践 刑事案件

2024

时代法学
湖南师范大学

时代法学

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.672
ISSN:1672-769X
年,卷(期):2024.22(2)
  • 15