从手段到目的:人民法院司法考核的内卷化与行政化——以A市F区法院多元化纠纷解决机制改革为视角
From Means to End:The Internalization and Administrativeization of Judicial Assessment in the People's Courts—The Reform of Diversified Dispute Resolution Mechanism in F District Court of City A as a Perspective
孙琳1
作者信息
- 1. 中国社会科学院大学法学院,北京 102488
- 折叠
摘要
当前,法院司法考核有从手段上升为目的的倾向.以A市F区法院多元化纠纷解决机制改革为例,该法院多元化纠纷解决机制改革所取得的荣誉数量与新收民商事案件数量形成鲜明对比.造成这一现象的一个重要缘由是,该法院为达到考核要求人为"注入""甩干"审理时间短、以撤诉方式结案的物业服务合同和供用热力合同的串案,由此揭示了当前同级法院司法考核的内卷化和上下级法院司法考核的行政化.对此,应从设置灵活的司法考核规则,构建多元的司法考核程序,以及科学地运用司法考核结果等方面对司法考核予以优化.
Abstract
Currently,there is a tendency for the judicial assessment of courts to rise from a means to an end.Taking the reform of the diversified dispute resolution mechanism of District Court F in City A as an example,the honor achieved by the reform of the diversified dispute resolution mechanism of the court contrasts sharply with the actual effect of the sudden increase and decrease in the number of newly received civil and commercial cases.The reason for this phenomenon is that the court has artificially"injected"and"dried up"cases of property service contract and heat supply contract which had been heard for a short period of time and closed by withdrawal in order to meet the requirements of the assessment,which reveals the internalization of the judicial assessment of the courts of the same level and the administrativeization of the judicial assessment of the courts of the lower and upper levels.Administrativeization of the judicial assessment of the courts at higher and lower levels.In this regard,the judicial assessment should be optimized in terms of setting up flexible judicial assessment rules,constructing diversified judicial assessment procedures,and scientifically applying judicial assessment results.
关键词
司法考核/内卷化/行政化/多元化纠纷解决机制改革/替代争议解决方式(ADR)Key words
judicial examination/internalization/administrative/diversified dispute resolution mechanism reform/ADR引用本文复制引用
基金项目
国家社会科学基金重大项目(18ZDA144)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据