论暴力袭击辅警案的裁判标准及重构
Analysis and Reconstruction of the Adjudication Standards for Violent Assaults on Auxiliary Police Officers
张亚飞 1郑瑞林2
作者信息
- 1. 山西财经大学法学院,山西 太原 030000;山西财经大学社会法研究中心,山西 太原 030000
- 2. 山西财经大学法学院,山西 太原 030000
- 折叠
摘要
考察《刑法修正案(十一)》出台前后裁判文书可知,暴力袭击辅警的刑事案件在当前司法适用中有诸多疑难问题且裁判标准并不统一.此类问题表现为难以区分妨害公务罪与袭警罪的构成要件要素,无法准确认定案件事实的行为对象,混淆对象与法益的侵害结果.解释论的方案选择上,"职务论"并不便于司法实践形成统一认定且与当前多数裁判结果相矛盾.现行立法下应以"身份论"为标准构建统一裁判规则,对肢体接触行为作消极评价;明确单一对象的认识错误处理以及共同对象的概括故意认定.
Abstract
The examination of judicial documents before and after the enactment of the"Eleventh Amend-ment to the Criminal Law"reveals numerous challenges and inconsistencies in the judicial handling of violent attacks on auxiliary police officers.These issues include difficulties in distinguishing the elements constituting the crime of obstructing official duties from the crime of assaulting a police officer,inaccuracies in identifying the subjects of the actions,and confusion between the harm to victims and the harm to legal interests.The"duty-based"interpretation approach does not facilitate the formation of a unified judicial determination and contradicts most current judgments.Under existing legislation,a"status-based"standard should be used to establish unified adjudication rules,negatively evaluating physical contact behaviors,clarifying the handling of recognition errors involving a single subject,and recognizing generalized intent involving multiple subjects.
关键词
袭警罪/辅警/职务论/身份论/司法适用Key words
crime of assaulting police officers/auxiliary police/duty-based approach/status-based ap-proach/judicial application引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据