首页|我国民事诉讼技术调查官制度的检视与完善

我国民事诉讼技术调查官制度的检视与完善

扫码查看
原文链接
  • 万方数据
  • 维普
近十年来,技术调查官制度在知识产权案件中对涉案技术事实的审查发挥了不可替代的独特功能,基于此,2022年12月《民事诉讼法》第五次修改草案正式将技术调查官纳入民事诉讼中,以更好地建立全方位、多角度的技术事实查明体系.司法实践中,技术调查官在任职模式、选任资质上还存在不足,与相关技术事实查明制度的衔接也存在矛盾,并且存在潜在的审判权让渡风险.为了回应扩大技术调查官制度适用范围的现实需求,有必要通过立法细化其管理与选任的规则,确定技术调查官的身份定位为"独立的审判辅助人员",对案涉技术事实的争议焦点提出建议,并在多元化技术事实查明机制中明确技术调查官制度的适用顺序,重构技术调查官参诉的组合和数量,明确技术调查意见的性质与公开方式,从而优化技术调查意见的采信机制.
The Construction of the Path to the Rule of Law for the System of Technical Investigation Officers in Civil Litigation
In the past decade,the technical investigation officer system has played an irreplaceable and unique function in the examination of the technical facts involved in intellectual property cases,based on which,the fifth draft revision of the Civil Procedure Law in December 2022 formally incorporated the technical investigation officer into civil litigation,in order to better establish an all-encompassing and multi-faceted technical fact-finding system.In judicial practice,there are still deficiencies in the mode of service and selection qualifications of technical investigation officers,as well as contradictions in the articulation with the relevant technical fact-finding system,and there are potential risks of ceding judgmental power.In order to respond to the real demand for expanding the scope of application of the technical investigation officer system,it is necessary to refine the rules for its management and selection through legislation,determine the identity of the technical investigation officer as an"independent trial auxiliary",make recommendations on the focus of the disputes over the technical facts of the case,and make clear the order of application of the technical investigation officer system in the diversified technical fact-finding mechanism,and reconstruct the technical fact-finding system.In the diversified technical fact-finding mechanism,it also clarified the order of application of the technical investigation officer system,restructured the combination and number of technical investigation officers participating in the litigation,and clarified the nature and publicity of the technical investigation opinions,so as to optimize the mechanism for the admissibility of the technical investigation opinions.

Civil procedureTechnical Investigations OfficerJudicial technicianTechnical fact-finding mechanismsTechnical survey observations

韩振文、姚梦琦

展开 >

浙江工商大学法学院,浙江 杭州 310018

民事诉讼 技术调查官 司法技术人员 技术事实查明机制 技术调查意见

浙江工商大学研究生教学研究与教学改革项目2024年度浙江省哲学社会科学规划领军人才培育课题一般项目

YJG202211024YJRC07ZD-3YB

2024

齐鲁师范学院学报
齐鲁师范学院

齐鲁师范学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子：0.246
ISSN：2095-4735
年,卷(期)：2024.39(1)
  • 29