首页|数字劳动之争:分歧与回应——数字劳动本质内涵再审视

数字劳动之争:分歧与回应——数字劳动本质内涵再审视

扫码查看
自传播政治经济学家达拉斯·斯麦兹 1977 年提出"受众商品论"以来,经由泰拉诺瓦、福克斯等学者进一步发展,关于"数字劳动"的研究不断升温,同时也造成了数字劳动概念的泛化.面对数字劳动尚存的特性争议以及对数字劳动主体界定不清的问题,解决的关键在于回归马克思对劳动的内在规定,从劳动物质性、生产性以及劳动与活动的差异出发明晰数字劳动的本质内涵.数字劳动并非自治马克思主义者所言的"非物质性劳动",其生产性也需从雇佣关系和资本增殖两方面进行判断,"用户上网即劳动"的等式并不成立.在新形势下唯有立足于马克思劳动观念的底层逻辑,才能在"变"与"不变"的探寻中赋予劳动以新的时代内涵.
The Digital Labor Controversy:Divergence and Response—Re-examination of the Essential Connotation of Digital Labor
Since communication political economist Dallas Walker Smythe put forward the"Audience Commodity Theory"in 1977,further developed by scholars such as Tiziana Terranova,Christian Fuchs,research on"digital labor"has been on the rise,which has also led to the generalization of the concept of digital labor.In the face of the remaining disputes over the characteristics of digital labor and the problem of unclear definition of the subject of digital labor,the key to solving the problem lies in retur-ning to Marx's provisions on the nature of labor,and clarifying the essential connotation of digital labor from the perspective of the materiality of labor,the productive nature of labor,as well as the difference between labor and activities.Digital labor is not the"immaterial labor"that autonomous Marxism says,and its productivity should be judged from both the employment relationship and capital accumulation,and the equation of"the user's internet access is labor"is not valid.Under the new form,only by basing ourselves on the underlying logic of Marx can we give labor a new connotation in the search for"change"and"constancy".

digital labormaterial laborproductive labordigital capital

熊桐建、张风帆

展开 >

北京工业大学 马克思主义学院,北京 100124

数字劳动 物质劳动 生产劳动 数字资本

2025

山东工会论坛
山东省工会管理干部学院

山东工会论坛

影响因子:0.225
ISSN:2095-7416
年,卷(期):2025.31(1)