首页|从"斗殴杀"到"伤害罪":刑法近代化转型镜鉴

从"斗殴杀"到"伤害罪":刑法近代化转型镜鉴

扫码查看
西法东渐以来,将杀人罪按照主观意图分为故意杀人罪和过失杀人罪两种.以清代斗殴杀为切入点,从立法和司法两个维度来探索刑法近代化转型.民国试图摒弃"具体情形"式立法,以抽象概念取代之.立法遂呈现不周延性,即清代斗杀类犯罪实际上无法准确归类于故意或过失杀人罪之中,遂引入伤害致死罪、聚众斗殴罪来弥补漏洞.司法上,法官断案时引用西方法律术语较少,仍援用以犯罪工具、犯罪行为等标识形成的具体情形来帮助判案的清朝模式.以清末民初刑法转型为鉴,我国现行法律改革应以内因为改革动力,循序渐进,立法语言应以规范和易懂相结合.
From"Fight and Kill"To"Injury Crime":On the Transformation of the Modernization of Criminal Law
Since the early stages of the West France period,the crime of homicide has been categorized into intentional manslaughter and manslaughter based on subjective intention.Commencing with the instances of fighting and killing in the Qing Dynasty,this paper explores the modernization transformation of criminal law from two dimensions:legislation and justice.During the Republic of China,efforts were made to move away from the"concrete situation"type of legislation and replace it with abstract concepts.Consequently,legislation faced delays,making it challenging to precisely classify the crime of fighting and killing in the Qing Dynasty as intentional or negligent manslaughter.To address this,the crimes of death from injury and affray were introduced to fill the gaps.Judicially,judges rarely cited Western legal terms when handling cases,continuing to rely on the Qing Dynasty model based on specific cases formed by criminal tools and acts to adjudicate cases.Drawing parallels with the transformation of criminal law in the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China,the ongoing legal reform in China should prioritize reform impetus,standardize legislative language for ease of understanding.

fighting and killingcrime of injurysituationmodernization

赵卓雅

展开 >

中南财经政法大学 法学院,湖北 武汉 430073

斗殴杀 伤害罪 情形 近代化

国家社会科学基金项目

18AFX004

2024

韶关学院学报
韶关学院

韶关学院学报

影响因子:0.28
ISSN:1007-5348
年,卷(期):2024.45(1)
  • 22