首页|"双重目标"下生育支持政策的建构逻辑与实现路径

"双重目标"下生育支持政策的建构逻辑与实现路径

扫码查看
从理论和实践经验来看,20世纪80时代以来部分国家女性就业率与生育率的正相关关系暗含了在构建生育支持政策体系时不仅要考虑提升生育率,同时也应优先保障女性就业.生育支持政策面临社会经济环境、劳动力市场和家庭等复杂的政策情景,需要重点关注制度之间的协调与适配问题.本文从福利-生产体制视角出发,分析平衡工作与生育的生育支持政策的建构逻辑,并采用定性比较分析方法(QCA),对24个典型国家的政策效果进行分析,总结出公共政策引导的赋能机制与 自由市场调节的筛选机制两条实现路径.本文一方面验证了制度的互补性所带来的政策协同和强化效应对于生育支持政策同样奏效;另一方面,通过与我国国情进行比较和讨论,从完善积极就业政策、灵活与保障并存的制度模式设计,以及从补缺到普惠的阶梯式政策介入三方面为完善我国生育支持政策提出对策建议.
Fertility Support Policy under the"Dual Goal":Construction Logic and Implementation Path
From both theoretical and practical perspectives,the observed positive correlation between female employment and fertility rates in certain countries since the 1980s suggests that when formulating fertility support policies,consideration should be given not only to increasing fertility rates but also to prioritizing women's employment.Fertility support policies encounter complex policy environments,including socio-economic factors,labor markets,and family dynamics,necessitating a focus on system coordination and adaptation.This paper examines the construction logic of fertility support policies that balance work and fertility through the lens of the welfare-production regime.Utilizing the qualitative comparative analysis(QCA)method,the paper analyzes the policy effects of 24 representative countries and identifies two implementation paths:the enabling mechanism guided by public policy and the screening mechanism regulated by the free market.The paper confirms the effectiveness of policy synergy and strengthening effects resulting from institutional complementarity in fertility support policies.Moreover,through a comparison with China's context,the paper proposes suggestions for improving China's fertility support policies across three dimensions:enhancing active employment policies,designing an institutional model that combines flexibility and security,and achieving universal coverage through incremental policy interventions.

fertility support policywelfare-production regimeinstitutional complementarityqualitative comparative analysis

于萌

展开 >

南京大学政府管理学院

生育支持政策 福利-生产体制 制度互补性 定性比较分析 低生育率

江苏省社会科学基金青年项目南京大学亚洲研究项目

21SHC010

2024

社会保障评论
中国社会保障学会,中国民政杂志社

社会保障评论

CSSCI
ISSN:2096-3211
年,卷(期):2024.8(2)
  • 45