首页|反思"多支柱养老金"

反思"多支柱养老金"

扫码查看
本文根据过去40多年全球性养老金改革的历程,结合中国的现状,对世界银行以私有化为核心的"多支柱模型"进行全面彻底反思;在描述2005年旧模型升级为以1支柱为核心并具有良好平衡性的新模型的历程基础上,介绍了新的国际共识.第一,新模型把1支柱的重要程度升级为整个体系中唯一的A+,将各种积累制都降级为B,将负担不起资本市场风险的低收入群体完全排除在积累制之外.第二,从政治经济稳定和效率的角度来看,0支柱非常重要,目前100多个国家都有0支柱,对于低收入群体来说,其替代率可达100%.第三,延迟退休是各国广泛采用的维持公共养老金可持续的适宜措施.相较之下,进行了私有化改革的绝大部分国家都已经撤回了私有化改革.第四,公共养老金余额储备是平滑代际间负担的有效办法,但是它不能解决可持续性问题.第五,不应依赖自愿缴费的制度来解决一个国家的养老金问题,因为其规模太小.第六,如果一个国家基金的回报率低于工资增长率,那么积累制就不是解决问题之道.第七,自20世纪80年代以来,发达国家的实际利率都呈现下降趋势,专家们并不确信低回报率未来能回高.第八,建议在发展积累制之前,打造好稳健可持续的公共养老金体系.没有任何一个国家在公共养老金不可持续的情况下成功运营积累制.第九,要想把积累制运营好,需要先培育好优良的金融市场及其监管制度.第十,即使在发达国家,企图通过建立庞大的补充性积累制养老金来成功地促进金融市场的发展也是困难的.
Reflections on the Multi-Pillar Pension Approach
Drawing from four decades of global pension reforms,this paper provides comprehensive reflections on the"multi-pillar pension"approach advocated by the World Bank,with privatization as its core,while considering the current state of pension reform in China.After revising the 2005 version of the approach into a well-balanced new model that is consistent with widely accepted pension economics and reflects global pension realities,the paper introduces international consensuses on pension reforms:First,the importance of Pillar 1 is upgraded to A+,while the significance of all funded pensions is downgraded to B,effectively excluding low-income earners who cannot afford the risks of capital markets from accessing funded pensions.Second,the crucial role of Pillar 0 is emphasized for political and economic stability and efficiency,with over 100 countries having adopted it,offering a replacement rate of up to 100%for low-income earners.Third,delaying retirement age is by far the most relevant approach to maintaining the sustainability of Pillar 1 and is widely adopted by almost all countries.In contrast,most countries that had implemented privatization reforms of public pensions have since reversed this approach.Fourth,the role of public pension reserve funds in smoothing intergenerational burdens is acknowledged,but their limitations in addressing the sustainability issues of unfunded pillars are also recognized.Fifth,caution is advised against relying solely on voluntary systems to address pension challenges due to their limited scale.Sixth,it is recognized that implementing a funded pension may not be a solution if a country's fund return rate is lower than its wage growth rate.Seventh,real interest rates in developed countries have shown a downward trend since the 1980s,and experts are not confident that the low returns can rise again in the future.Eighth,it is strongly recommended to first establish strong and well-run public pillars before focusing on a mandated or voluntary funded pillar,as no country has successfully operated a funded pension with unbalanced unfunded pillars.Ninth,to operate funded pensions effectively,it is necessary to first establish and regulate financial markets.Tenth,the challenges of promoting financial market development through establishing large supplementary pension funds,even in developed countries,are acknowledged.

multi-pillar pensionsdelaying retirement agesustainability of public pensionsreturn on investmentwage growth rate

罗伯特·霍尔茨曼、王新梅

展开 >

奥地利国家银行(中央银行)

浙江大学民生保障与公共治理研究中心、老龄和健康研究中心

多支柱养老金 延迟退休 公共养老金的可持续性 资本回报率 工资增长率

国家社会科学基金重大项目

22&ZD090

2024

社会保障评论
中国社会保障学会,中国民政杂志社

社会保障评论

CSSCI
ISSN:2096-3211
年,卷(期):2024.8(3)
  • 16