首页|"刘歆作伪说"在清代学术史上的演进

"刘歆作伪说"在清代学术史上的演进

Rethink:The Alleged Forgery by Liu Xin in History of Qing Scholarship

扫码查看
清代学术史上的"刘歆作伪说"有着复杂的演进历程.该说源自宋明儒者对《周礼》的怀疑,在清初扩展至三礼学领域.此说在清初不乏反对者,至乾嘉更引来惠栋、戴震等汉学家的批驳,因而一度被彻底否定.汉学家从文字、历法等角度重新展开考辨,认为刘歆在《尚书》文字和年月上存在误读.这种取径被庄述祖在《尚书》学研究中汲取并转化,催生了今文经学意义上的"刘歆作伪说".刘逢禄把对刘歆作伪的指控扩展至《左传》,此后迭经宋翔凤、龚自珍、魏源、邵懿辰、廖平扬其波,逐渐向多种经典蔓延.康有为《新学伪经考》实集诸家之大成,其学术源泉遍布整个清代学术史.厘清"刘歆作伪说"的起承转合之迹,不仅有助于衡估康说的理论价值,亦有助于重审清代今古文之争中关键议题的渊源与流变.
The present paper,reconstructing the history,in which Qing scholars since Qianlong and Jiaqing reigns accused Liu Xin,a leading scholars of Former Han(202 BC-8 AD),of academic forgery and all these accusations were finally epitomized in Kang Youwei's well-known work exposing forged Confucian classics,argues that this rethinking effort is conducive to reevaluating the theoretical value of Kang's work and clari-fying origin and changes of key topics in Qing scholars'debate on old-text and new-text Confucianism.

赵四方

展开 >

华东师范大学历史学系 200241

刘歆 作伪 乾嘉汉学 今文经学

2024

史林
上海社会科学院历史研究所

史林

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.278
ISSN:1007-1873
年,卷(期):2024.(4)