With the advancement of"the new liberal arts",computational jurisprudence is becoming a heated interdisciplinary subject and research paradigm in recent years.The current problem with computational jurisprudence in China is that there is no consensus on the"computation"of computational jurisprudence,especially in terms of the research scope and the development path of the discipline.Utilizing various statistical methods and research tools,this paper systematically collates,analyzes,and compares relevant literature on computational jurisprudence worldwide in the last two decades,and reproduces the evolution and differences in relevant research stages,research collaborations,research themes,and knowledge structures at home and abroad from the early 21st century to the present.Compared with foreign countries,Chinese computational jurisprudence may head toward a division in multiple subdivided research categories.Advocating problem-oriented computational jurisprudence research in computational law is conducive to the collating of the relationships between different research paths and the promoting of the orderly development of the discipline.It is imperative for the academic community to actively foster the integration of research paths within computational jurisprudence across multiple dimensions,including issue awareness,research capability,and research methods.This collaborative effort will facilitate the exploration of a promising future development path for Chinese computational jurisprudence.