首页|完善全球治理"共商机制"的对策探析

完善全球治理"共商机制"的对策探析

扫码查看
确立"共商"在全球治理中的先导作用、脱域功能和多维价值导向,对完善全球治理体系有重要意义.在类型化方法的分析下,全球治理"共商机制"的沟通内容可分为重大国际政治议题、全球公共政策与知识、地域及议题分支下的自治事务三类,"共商机制"以异见整合为工作目标."共商机制"由辩论、说理和对话三个路径交互生成,其各有特色和局限.既有"共商机制"在应用中的阙如主要体现为常以单边立场作为辩论主题、霸权说理居于强势地位、圈子化和排他性对话侵蚀全球团结.为完善"共商机制",应当用共识性辩论避免落入"自证陷阱",用公共性说理颠覆霸权"孤证循环"、构建可动员国际社会广大成员的"共同自证系统",用和合性对话承袭共识性辩论和公共性说理之成果,激励多元主体以问题为导向进行自证实践,对接"共建共享".
Exploration On Countermeasures To Improve The Extensive Consultation Mechanism of Global Governance
Establishing the guiding role,along with the disembedding and ontological status of extensive consultation in global governance is of great significance for improving the global governance system.In the typology analysis,the communication content of"consultation mechanism"for global governance can be categorized into three types:major international political issues,global public policies,and regional and issue-oriented autonomous issues,with the integration of dissent as the working goal.The"consultation mechanism"is generated through the interplay of three paths:argumentation,reasoning,and dialogue,each of which has its own characteristics and limitations.The deficiencies of the"consultation mechanism"in practice are mainly reflected in the frequent use of unilateral positions as debate themes,the dominance of hegemonic reasoning,and the erosion of global unity due to circle-driven and exclusive dialogues.To improve the"consultation mechanism,"it is necessary to use consensus-based debate to avoid falling into the"self-justification trap,"employ public reasoning to disrupt hegemonic"isolated proof cycles,"and build a"common self-justification system"that mobilizes a wide range of international members.Using harmonious dialogue to build upon the results of consensus-based debate and public reasoning can inspire diverse stakeholders to engage in problem-oriented self-justification practices,aligning with the principles of"joint contribution and shared benefits.".

global governanceextensive consultation,joint contribution,and shared benefitscommunity with a shared future for mankindconsultative democracyArctic governance

丁煌、吕嘉欣

展开 >

武汉大学政治与公共管理学院(武汉430072)

武汉大学中国边界与海洋研究院(武汉430072)

全球治理 "共商共建共享" 人类命运共同体 协商民主 北极治理

2024

上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
上海交通大学

上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.94
ISSN:1008-7095
年,卷(期):2024.32(11)