摘要
受分科治学架构下外来后出观念的影响制约,历史研究及其叙述往往将认识等同于事实甚至作为预设前提,以求史事与逻辑的自洽,却经不起全部文本史事复归时空本位并条贯前后联系的验证.即使栩栩如生的逼真,仍然不能如实,反而是失真的假,而且更容易以假乱真.区分五四运动前的新思潮、五四运动及其后的新文化运动的分别及联系,将新文化运动的历史与历史上的新文化运动合为一炉,避免将历史认识与历史事实混为一谈,才能呈现新文化运动整体的实况,进而确定其历史地位和影响.
Abstract
Influenced and constrained by both the imported and emergent concepts within the disciplinary frame-work,historical research and its narratives often equate understanding with facts,even regarding them as pre-supposed premises,in pursuit of internal coherence between historical events and logical constructs.However,such narratives fail to withstand the scrutiny of comprehensive textual analysis grounded in spatiotemporal con-text and cohesive continuity.Despite their verisimilitude,they fall short of fidelity,rendering what appears lifelike as distorted falsities,thereby more susceptible to confounding truth with falsehood.Distinguishing be-tween the pre-May Fourth New Thought Movement,the May Fourth Movement,and the subsequent New Cul-ture Movement,and integrating the history of the New Culture Movement with historical events,prevents con-flating historical understanding with historical facts.Only by doing so can the full picture of the New Culture Movement be presented accurately,allowing for the determination of its historical significance and impact.
NETL
NSTL
万方数据