上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)2024,Vol.53Issue(2) :111-118.DOI:10.13852/J.CNKI.JSHNU.2024.02.011

福楼拜小说叙事形态辨——基于亨利·詹姆斯与埃德蒙·杜朗蒂等人的比较

On the Narrative Forms of Flaubert's Novels:A Comparative Study of Henry James and Edmund Duranti

陈军 戴无嫣
上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)2024,Vol.53Issue(2) :111-118.DOI:10.13852/J.CNKI.JSHNU.2024.02.011

福楼拜小说叙事形态辨——基于亨利·詹姆斯与埃德蒙·杜朗蒂等人的比较

On the Narrative Forms of Flaubert's Novels:A Comparative Study of Henry James and Edmund Duranti

陈军 1戴无嫣2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 南京图书馆(江苏南京210018);南京大学;扬州大学
  • 2. 扬州大学文学院(江苏扬州225002);杭州师范大学外国语学院
  • 折叠

摘要

亨利·詹姆斯通过福楼拜评论,对福楼拜小说的叙事形态进行了独到的分析,他认为福楼拜的小说叙事形态和文体风格绝非如埃德蒙·杜朗蒂等人所言之"冷酷漠然""枯燥乏味",而是强调对社会现实进行一种客观冷静、超然无我的观照.福楼拜小说这一独特的叙事形态是他对19世纪法国社会变迁的艺术反映,亨利·詹姆斯评论福楼拜对客观真实的认知以及呈现的方式已经与传统理念分道扬镳,彰显出福楼拜在新的历史场景中对小说道德内涵的理解和艺术创作方法上的创见.

Abstract

Henry James developed a unique analysis of the narrative form of Flaubert's novels through his review of Flaubert's literary works.He believed that Flaubert's narrative form and literary style were not"cold and indifferent"or"dull and boring"as Edmund Duranti and others said,but emphasized an objective,calm,and selfless observation of social reality.The unique narrative form of Flaubert's novels is his artistic reflection of social changes in 19th century France.Henry James commented that Flaubert's cognition of objective truth and the way it is presented have diverged from traditional concepts,highlighting Flaubert's understanding of the moral connotations of novels in new historical scenes and his innovative artistic creation methods.

关键词

福楼拜/小说叙事形态/亨利·詹姆斯/埃德蒙·杜朗蒂/现代小说观

Key words

Flaubert/narrative forms of the novel/Henry James/Edmund Duranti/concepts of the modern novel

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
中国上海师范大学

上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.697
ISSN:1004-8634
参考文献量33
段落导航相关论文