同济大学学报(医学版)2024,Vol.45Issue(3) :411-415.DOI:10.12289/j.issn.2097-4345.23398

良性囊性甲状腺结节治疗方式选择与效果比较

Comparison of treatment efficacy for benign cystic thyroid nodules:polidocanol sclerotherapy versus radiofrequency ablation

吴墅 郭佳 何峥 盛建国 卢峰 高志玲 吴凡
同济大学学报(医学版)2024,Vol.45Issue(3) :411-415.DOI:10.12289/j.issn.2097-4345.23398

良性囊性甲状腺结节治疗方式选择与效果比较

Comparison of treatment efficacy for benign cystic thyroid nodules:polidocanol sclerotherapy versus radiofrequency ablation

吴墅 1郭佳 1何峥 1盛建国 1卢峰 1高志玲 1吴凡1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 上海中医药大学附属曙光医院超声中心,上海 201203
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 分析聚桂醇硬化和射频消融在治疗良性囊性甲状腺结节中的实际应用疗效,并探讨患者对治疗方式的选择.方法 回顾性选择2017年9月—2023年10月在上海中医药大学附属曙光医院接受硬化和射频治疗的良性囊性甲状腺结节患者.共纳入86例患者(99个结节),根据患者的治疗意愿分为硬化组(70个结节)和射频组(29个结节).随访12个月,比较两组的结节体积缩小率、手术时长、治疗费用、复发率、美容问题改善以及主要并发症的数量,并分析患者对治疗方式的偏好.结果 硬化组的平均体积减少为83.5%(21例),射频组为89.5%(17例),两组之间的差异无统计学意义.与射频组相比,硬化组在治疗时长和治疗费用方面表现出更大的优势.两组患者的美容评分和复发率差异均无统计学意义(P=0.823和P=0.191).两组均未发生重大并发症.结论 硬化治疗费用更低、治疗时间更短,年龄较大的患者更倾向于选择硬化治疗.

Abstract

Objective To compare the therapeutic efficacy of polidocanol sclerotherapy and radiofrequency ablation in treatment of benign cystic thyroid nodules,and to explore the patient's preference for treatment options.Methods A total of 86 patients with benign cystic thyroid nodules(99 nodules)who underwent polidocanol sclerotherapy(70 nodules)or radiofrequency ablation(29 nodules)in Shuguang Hospital affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from September 2017 to October 2023 were enrolled in the study.The nodule volume reduction rate,surgical duration,treatment cost,recurrence rate,cosmetic improvement,and incidence of major complications were compared between the groups,and the preference of patients for treatment methods was analyzed.Results Thirty eight patients were followed up for 12 months,there was no significant difference in the average volume reduction between the sclerotherapy group(n=21)and radiofrequency group(n=17)(83.5%vs 89.5%,P>0.05).The sclerotherapy group showed greater advantages over the radiofrequency group in treatment duration and costs.There were no significant differences in cosmetic scores and recurrence rates between the two groups(P=0.823 and P=0.191).No major complications occurred in both groups.Conclusion Compared to radiofrequency ablation,sclerotherapy is more cost-effective,requires a shorter treatment time,and is preferred by older patients.

关键词

消融/超声/甲状腺结节/体积缩小率

Key words

ablation/ultrasound/thyroid nodules/volume reduction rate

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
同济大学学报(医学版)
同济大学

同济大学学报(医学版)

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.51
ISSN:1008-0392
参考文献量3
段落导航相关论文