书法研究2024,Issue(3) :155-166.

阮元南北書派論及其駁議之批評

A Criticism of Ruan Yuan's Theory of the North-South Schools of Calligraphy and of the Rebuttal of His Theory

石國强
书法研究2024,Issue(3) :155-166.

阮元南北書派論及其駁議之批評

A Criticism of Ruan Yuan's Theory of the North-South Schools of Calligraphy and of the Rebuttal of His Theory

石國强1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 南京藝術學院美術學院
  • 折叠

摘要

阮元南北書派論在内容和論述上確實存在不足,地域、時代、流派的交錯所潜藏的矛盾,使其自身難以自洽.駁議者雖衆,但多不能切中要害,他們通常忽視南北地域書法風格差異的客觀性,而陷入以同攻異的邏辑誤區.阮元的强造統系使南北書派不再受限于時代,進而導致書家個體南北派屬的淆亂,使其論述陷入主觀的泥潭.針對這些問題重申南北書派論作爲地域書法風格論的性質,梳理南北分派的客觀依據,并對其做出條件上的限定,無疑具有重要意義.

Abstract

Ruan Yuan's theory concerning the Northern and Southern schools of calligraphy exhibits shortcomings in both content and argumentation.The contradictions arising from the intersection of regions,eras and schools make it inherently inconsistent.While there are numerous critics,many fail to address the core issues.They often overlook the objective differences in calligraphic style between the northern and southern regions,falling into the logical fallacy of rejecting their differences on the grounds of their similarities.Ruan Yuan's imposition of a unified calligraphic system frees the Northern and Southern schools of calligraphy from temporal constraints,thus leading to a confusion of the individual calligraphers'affiliations with the Northern or Southern schools and miring any critical discourse in subjectivity.In order to address these issues,it is essential to reaffirm the theory of the Northern and Southern schools of calligraphy as a debate on regional calligraphic styles,to elucidate the objective basis for the distinction between the Northern and Southern schools and then to place conditional limitations on Ruan Yuan's discourse on the North-South schools of calligraphy.

关键词

阮元/南北書派論/駁議/批評

Key words

Ruan Yuan/theory of the Northern and Southern Schools of Calligraphy/rebuttal/critique

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
书法研究
上海书画出版社

书法研究

CSSCI北大核心
ISSN:
段落导航相关论文