首页|艾司氯胺酮与右美托咪定预防小儿七氟烷麻醉苏醒期躁动发生的效果比较

艾司氯胺酮与右美托咪定预防小儿七氟烷麻醉苏醒期躁动发生的效果比较

Intravenous esketamine versus dexmedetomidine in preventing emergence agitation after sevoflurane anesthesia in children

扫码查看
目的 比较艾司氯胺酮与右美托咪定预防小儿七氟烷麻醉苏醒期躁动(EA)发生的效果.方法 选择2020年8-10月在上海交通大学医学院附属上海儿童医学中心行择期腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术的患儿60例,年龄2~7岁,采用计算机随机分组化原则将患儿分为艾司氯胺酮组和右美托咪定组.麻醉诱导期间艾司氯胺酮组予艾司氯胺酮0.5 mg/kg静脉注射,右美托咪定组予右美托咪定0.3 μg/kg静脉注射,术中均予以体积分数为0.02~0.03七氟烷与体积分数为0.5氧气吸入维持.记录两组患儿的一般资料,包括年龄、性别构成、BMI、手术时长.分别于术前(T0)、气管插管即刻(T1)、拔管即刻(T2)记录患儿的心率、平均动脉压(MAP).记录两组患儿的拔管时间、麻醉恢复室(PACU)停留时间,以及麻醉后EA、术后疼痛、不良事件发生率.结果 两组间患儿的年龄、性别构成、BMI、手术时长的差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05).在T0、T1、T2时间点,两组间患儿的心率和MAP的差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05).艾司氯胺酮组术后疼痛发生率(6.7%)显著低于右美托咪定组(26.7%,P<0.05);艾司氯胺酮组患儿麻醉后EA发生率和术后不良事件发生率分别为13.3%、6.7%,与右美托咪定组的16.7%、3.3%的差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05).艾司氯胺酮组拔管时间为(6.9±2.2)min、PACU停留时间为(24.0±13.2)min,右美托咪定组拔管时间为(6.1±2.5)min、PACU停留时间为(28.7±9.1)min;两组间患儿的拔管时间和PACU停留时间的差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05).结论 麻醉诱导期间注射艾司氯胺酮0.5 mg/kg预防小儿七氟烷麻醉后EA与0.3 μg/kg右美托咪定的效果相当,且其镇痛效果优于右美托咪定.
Objective To compare esketamine with dexmedetomidine in preventing emergency agitation(EA)in children after sevoflurane-based general anesthesia.Methods Sixty children,aged 2-7 years,undergoing elective laparoscopic high ligation of hernial sac in Shanghai Children's Medical Center from August to October 2020 were randomly divided into two groups.During anesthesia induction,the esketamine group was given esketamine 0.5 mg/kg intravenously,and the dexmedetomidine group was given dexmedetomidine 0.3 pg/kg intravenously.Sevoflurane with a volume fraction of 0.02-0.03 and oxygen with a volume fraction of 0.5 were inhaled during surgery in both groups.The general information of the patients such as age,gender composition,body mass index(BMI),and surgical duration were recorded.The heart rate(HR)and mean arterial pressure(MAP)before surgery(T0),immediately after tracheal intubation(T1),and immediately after extubation(T2),as well as the extubation time,stay time in the postanesthesia care unit(PACU),and incidence of postoperative adverse events were also recorded.Results There was no significant difference in the age,gender composition,BMI or surgical duration(all P>0.05).At the time points of T0,T1,T2,there was no significant difference in HR or MAP between the two groups(all P>0.05).The incidence of postoperative pain in the esketamine group was significantly lower than that in the dexmedetomidine group(6.7%vs.26.7%,P<0.05).The incidences of EA and adverse events were 13.3%and 6.7%in the esketamine group,respectively,and 16.7%and 3.3%in the dexmedetomidine group.There was no significant difference in the incidence of EA or adverse events between the two groups(all P>0.05).The extubation time and stay time in the PACU were(6.9±2.2)min and(24.0±13.2)min in the esketamine group,respectively,and(6.1±2.5)min and(28.7±9.1)min in the dexmedetomidine group.There was no significant difference in the extubation time or PACU stay time between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion The intravenous 0.5 mg/kg esketamine is equivalent to 0.3 μg/kg dexmedetomidine in preventing EA after sevoflurane anesthesia in children,and esketamine has better postoperative analgesic effect than dexmedetomidine.

EsketamineDexmedetomidineChildrenEmergency agitationSevoflurane anesthesia

周思易、黄悦、李波、张剑蔚

展开 >

200127 上海,上海交通大学医学院附属上海儿童医学中心麻醉科

艾司氯胺酮 右美托咪定 儿童 苏醒期躁动 七氟烷麻醉

2024

上海医学
上海市医学会

上海医学

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.582
ISSN:0253-9934
年,卷(期):2024.47(1)
  • 36