首页|涉外知识产权法律适用中被请求保护地法之界定

涉外知识产权法律适用中被请求保护地法之界定

扫码查看
知识产权法律适用中被请求保护地法起源于《伯尔尼公约》第5条第2款.对《伯尔尼公约》第5条,学者之间形成了"被请求保护地法说"、"来源国法说"和"非冲突规范说"三种不同观点.在《伯尔尼公约》的影响下,各国在相关的国内知识产权冲突法中开始逐步采用被请求保护地的法律.但《伯尔尼公约》第5条第2款与生俱来的争议决定了被请求保护地作为连结点在含义上的模糊性.为此,一些学术机构分别制定了有关知识产权法律适用规则的建议稿,这些规则及解释对于理解被请求保护地具有重大参考价值.2010年颁布的《中华人民共和国涉外民事关系法律适用法》第48条、第50条规定以被请求保护地法作为涉外知识产权法律适用的一般原则.然而,在司法实践中,法院对被请求保护地法的适用存在分歧,带来法律适用的不确定性和不可预见性.我国应该借鉴被请求保护地法在有关国际法律文件中的具体规定,在司法实践中,依据不同类型的知识产权案件,对其含义分别作不同界定.
Identification of Lex Loci Protectionis in the Application of Law of Foreign-related Intellectual Property
Lex loci protectionis in the application of intellectual property law originates from Article 5(2)of the Berne Convention.However,regarding Article 5 of the Berne Convention,scholars have formed three different views:"lex loci protectionis","the law of the country of origin",and"non conflict of rules".Under the influence of the Berne Convention,countries have gradually adopted lex loci protectionis in their domestic intellectual property conflict law.However,the inherent dispute in Article 5(2)of the Berne Convention has determined the ambiguity in the meaning of lex loci protectionis as a connecting point.For this reason,some academic institutions have developed recommendation drafts on the conflict rules of intellectual property,which have significant reference value for understanding lex loci protectionis.Article 48 and Article 50 of the Law on the Application of Law in Foreign-related Civil Relations in 2010 stipulate that lex loci protectionis shall be the general principle for the application of foreign-related intellectual property.However,in judicial practice,there are disputes in the application of lex loci protectionis by the court,resulting in uncertainty and unpredictability in the application of the law.China should learn from the specific provisions of lex loci protectionis in relevant international legal documents and judicial practice,defining its meaning differently based on different types of intellectual property cases.

intellectual propertylex loci protectionisnational treatmentterritoriality

乔雄兵、陈文思

展开 >

武汉大学国际法研究所,湖北 武汉 430072

知识产权 被请求保护地法 国民待遇 属地性

国家社会科学基金

21BFX161

2024

石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
石河子大学

石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.311
ISSN:1671-0304
年,卷(期):2024.38(2)
  • 2