摘要
党的十八大以来,党政联合发文作为一种既成的制度规范,其数量激增,但在实践运行中涉及备案审查、信息公开时的"归属"问题却饱受争议.为此,国内学界从其发展历程、党政关系、党规与国法、规范适用等维度剖析党政联合发文的性质属性,基本形成了"单一属性论""双重属性论""复合属性论"和"回避论"四种分析态势.但任何一种分析态势都难免具有局限性,亟需不断结合理论和实践对其进行反思和完善.基于此,该文将党政联合发文置于特定语境之下,明确其理论前提,结合动态的实践,探讨"属性论"可分析范式的突破.
Abstract
Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China,the number of party-government joint publications,as an established institutional norm,has increased sharply.However,in practice,the issue of"attribution"when it comes to record review and information disclosure has been controversial.For this reason,the domestic academic circles have analyzed the nature and attributes of the joint publication of the Party and the government from the dimensions of its development process,party-government relationship,party regulations and national laws,and normative application,basically forming the four analytical situations of"single attribute theory","dual attribute theory",and"composite attribute theory"and"avoidance".However,any analysis situation inevitably has limitations,and it is urgent to continuously reflect on and improve it by combining theory and practice.Based on these,this article puts the joint party-government document in a specific context,clarifies its theoretical premise,and explores breakthroughs in the analyzable paradigm of"attribute theories"based on dynamic practice.
NETL
NSTL
万方数据