首页|个人信息处理的同意撤回权:法理阐释与规则续造

个人信息处理的同意撤回权:法理阐释与规则续造

扫码查看
同意撤回权法律规定简洁,加之其缺少相应的司法解释与统一的实践标准,仍存在着理解与适用困境.该权利应理解为个人信息主体通过撤回同意使得有效意思表示归于消灭,从而单方面限制他人介入其人格领域,其实质上是具有人格权属性的撤销权.区别于《中华人民共和国民法典》规定的行为能力,十四周岁的未成年人已具备个人信息同意能力,其有权随时以便捷的方式同意将个人信息全部或部分撤回.对于现行法中同意撤回规则存在的利益失衡问题,可以在重塑信息处理者的同意征求机制、完备其风险评估及告知义务的同时,分情况限制同意撤回权的行使,并同步配备赔偿责任的例外规则,以期实现个人信息保护与经济效益的协调发展.
Jurisprudence of the Right of Withdrawal of Consent for Personal Information and the Renewal of Rules
The concise legal provisions on the right to withdraw consent,coupled with its lack of corresponding judicial interpretation and uniform standards of practice,still have difficulties in understanding and application.This right refers to the individual's authority to unilaterally restrict others'interference in their personal sphere by withdrawing consent,effectively terminating a valid expression of intent.Essentially,it is a right of revocation that possesses the attributes of personal rights.In contrast to the capacity to act under the Civil Code,minors aged 14 have the legal capacity to consent to personal information,and they have the right to withdraw their consent in whole or in part at any time and in a convenient manner.To address the imbalance of interests in current withdrawal of consent regulations,we can restructure the consent solicitation mechanisms for information processors,ensuring they fulfill their risk assessment and notification obligations.Additionally,we should restrict the exercise of the withdrawal right on a case-by-case basis and provide exceptions to liability rules,aiming for a balanced development between personal information protection and economic benefits.

personal information protectionright to withdraw consentright of revocationbalance of interests

丁凤玲、周佳琦

展开 >

福州大学法学院,福建福州,350108

个人信息保护 同意撤回权 撤销权 利益平衡

福建省习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究中心福州大学研究基地重点项目福建省社会科学基金青年项目

23FZUJDB04FJ2022C063

2024

石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
石河子大学

石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.311
ISSN:1671-0304
年,卷(期):2024.38(4)