首页|组织行为与制度变迁——欧盟能源治理的三重逻辑

组织行为与制度变迁——欧盟能源治理的三重逻辑

扫码查看
能源安全是地区能源治理的核心 目标.通过分析欧盟能源治理制度的变迁,作者提出了能源治理环境与制度变迁的三种逻辑,分别是安全环境与生存性逻辑、技术环境与后果性逻辑以及制度环境与适当性逻辑.这三种逻辑分别与供应稳定、价格低廉和生态环保的能源安全目标相对应,体现了地区能源治理制度的不同特点.在欧盟能源治理制度变迁的过程中,其主导逻辑各不相同.在技术环境影响下,欧盟能源治理制度受后果性逻辑主导,强调欧盟在政治、经济和外交层面加强统一行动,旨在以高效率和低成本的方式实现能源安全目标.随着安全和技术环境趋于稳定,制度环境的显著变化为适当性逻辑发挥主导作用创造了条件,能源转型与应对气候变化被确立为地区能源治理制度的核心.2022年乌克兰危机的爆发深刻影响了欧盟对能源安全的认知,短期内生存性逻辑主导了欧盟能源治理制度的变迁.从长期来看,全球应对气候变化和可持续发展的制度环境并未改变,适当性逻辑仍将深刻影响欧盟能源治理的制度变迁.
Organizational Behavior and Institutional Change:The Three Logics of EU Energy Governance
Energy security is the core goal of regional energy governance.By analyzing the institutional change of EU energy governance,this article puts forward three kinds of matc-hing types of energy governance environment and institutional change,namely the security environment and the logic of survival,the technical environment and the logic of conse-quence,and the institutional environment and the logic of appropriateness.These three log-ics respectively correspond to the energy security goals of stable supply,cost-effective price,and ecological and environmental friendliness,reflecting different institutional char-acteristics of regional energy governance.The dominant logic of EU energy governance is different in the three stages of its institutional change.Under the influence of the technical environment,the institutional change of EU energy governance was dominated by the logic of consequences,which strengthened unified actions at the political,economic,and diplo-matic levels,aiming at achieving energy security goals in an efficient and low-cost way.As the security environment and the technical environment gradually stabilized,significant changes in the institutional environment created conditions for the logic of appropriateness to exert its influence.Then,energy transition and response to climate change were established as the core of the regional energy governance institutions.The outbreak of the Ukraine crisis in 2022 significantly affected the EU's perception of energy security.In the short term,the logic of survival dominates the institutional change of EU energy governance;eliminating the energy dependence on Russia has become the EU's passive response to the shock to its security environment.In the long run,the institutional environment of the global response to climate change and sustainable development remains unchanged.The logic of appropri-ateness will still profoundly affect the institutional change of EU energy governance.

EU energy governanceinstitutional changethe logic of consequencethe logic of appropriatenessthe logic of survival

江思羽

展开 >

中国社会科学院世界经济与政治研究所 北京 100732

欧盟能源治理 制度变迁 后果性逻辑 适当性逻辑 生存性逻辑

中国社会科学院青启计划

2024QQJH167

2024

世界经济与政治
中国社会科学院 世界经济与政治研究所

世界经济与政治

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.132
ISSN:1006-9550
年,卷(期):2024.(2)
  • 154