首页|外交平衡、控局能力认知与欧亚地区危机

外交平衡、控局能力认知与欧亚地区危机

扫码查看
在大国激烈博弈的背景下,中小国家的政局动荡为大国赢得竞争提供了机会窗口,但也容易引发地区危机.这种危机升级路径的核心特点是中小国家政局动荡的结果与其外交倾向调整直接联动,域外大国与地区主导国随之展开竞争性介入,导致危机加剧.中小国家保持外交方向的延续性与平衡性或将外交方向议题从政局动荡中剥离,理论上有助于减少域外大国的介入意愿.地区主导国可以依据自身的控局能力决定是否介入,执行平衡政策的中小国家因而有机会将地区主导国的介入转化为管控手段,降低危机升级的可能性.通过地区主导国对自身控局能力的认知差异与中小国家外交平衡调整或延续两个变量的组合,可以搭建起解释危机如何在可控与失控之间演进的分析框架.2020年以来发生在白俄罗斯、吉尔吉斯斯坦、哈萨克斯坦和乌克兰的四场危机带来的启示在于,中小国家的政局动荡并不必然导致大国介入和危机的升级外溢,没有发生政局动荡的中小国家也有可能在大国的竞争性介入下面临难以管控的危机.对中小国家来说,保持外交政策的延续性与平衡性,避免外交平衡发生大幅度的倾向调整,可以限制大国介入和争夺的空间,从而促进危机管控.
Diplomatic Balance,Perception of Controlling Capabilities and Crisis in the Eurasian Region
Amidst the intense strategic competition among great powers,political turmoil in medium-and small-sized states provides opportunities for great powers to gain a competi-tive edge,yet it also has the potential to trigger regional crises.The key feature of this esca-lation trajectory in crises is the direct correlation between the political turmoil in medium-and small-sized states and adjustments in diplomatic inclinations.Then the correlation trig-gers competitive interventions from external great powers and the regional hegemon,leading to an aggravation of the crisis.If medium-and small-sized states maintain continuity and balance in their diplomatic orientations,or if they separate diplomatic issues from political turmoil,theoretically,it contributes to reducing the inclination of external great powers to intervene.The regional hegemon may decide whether to intervene based on their own con-trolling capabilities.Thus,medium-and small-sized states implementing balanced policies have the opportunity to turn the intervention of the regional hegemon into instruments for management,thereby reducing the potential for crisis escalation.By combining the varia-tions in regional hegemons'perceptions of their own controlling capabilities and the adjust-ment or continuation of diplomatic balancing by small states,we can establish an analytical framework for explaining the evolution of crises between manageable and unmanageable.The lessons from the four crises that have occurred since 2020 in I elarus,Kyrgyzstan,Kazakhstan,and Ukraine respectively suggest that political turmoil in medium-and small-sized states does not always lead to intervention by great powers or the escalation of cri-ses.While medium-and small-sized states without political turmoil may still face crises that are difficult to control due to competitive interventions by great powers.By ensuring the con-tinuity and balance of their diplomatic policies,medium-and small-sized states can effec-tively limit the space for great powers'intervention and rivalry,thereby fostering better cri-sis management.

diplomatic balancepolitical turmoilcrisis managementEurasian regionUkraine crisis

顾炜

展开 >

上海社会科学院国际问题研究所(上海 邮编:200020)

外交平衡 政局动荡 危机管控 欧亚地区安全 乌克兰危机

上海市东方英才计划青年项目(上海市青年拔尖人才项目)(2022)

2024

世界经济与政治
中国社会科学院 世界经济与政治研究所

世界经济与政治

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.132
ISSN:1006-9550
年,卷(期):2024.(4)
  • 66