首页|新时代下的东亚高校人文社科学术评价及其改革路径——以中、日、韩高校人文社科学术评价体系为例

新时代下的东亚高校人文社科学术评价及其改革路径——以中、日、韩高校人文社科学术评价体系为例

扫码查看
中、日、韩等东亚高校在人文社科学术评价中面临着"三对张力"——"国际化"评价与"本土化"评价之间的张力、"标准化"评价与"多元化"评价之间的张力、"传统文科"评价与"新文科"评价之间的张力.文章通过文献研究、比较研究、案例研究等方法,阐释了人文社科学术评价的定位、特色与发展趋势,对新时代下东亚高校人文社科学术评价的改革路径提出了思考与建议:从照搬移植走向"以我为主、面向世界"的评价体系;从单一化、标准化评价体系走向多元化、特色化评价体系;从"传统文科"评价体系走向"新文科"评价体系.
The Characteristics and Reform Paths of Humanities and Social Sciences Academic Evaluation in East Asian Colleges and Universities in the New Era:Based on the Examples of China,Japan,and South Korea
Colleges and universities in East Asian countries,including those in China,Japan,and South Korea,face"three pairs of tensions"in the evaluation of humanities and social sciences:the tension between"internationalization"and"localization",the tension between"standardization"and"diversification",as well as the tension between"traditional humanities"and"innovative humanities".Through research methods such as literature review,comparative research and case studies,this article explains the positioning,characteristics,and development trends of academic evaluation in humanities and social sciences,putting forward thoughts and suggestions on the reform path of academic evaluation in humanities and social sciences in East Asian colleges and universities in the new era:transitioning from transplanted model to an evaluation system with self-awareness and international view;moving from a singular and standardized evaluation system to a diversified and distinctive evaluation system;evolving from the evaluation system of"traditional humanities and social sciences"to the evaluation system of"new humanities and social sciences".

Academic evaluation in colleges and universitiesHumanities and social sciencesEast AsiaChinaJapanSouth Korea

何宛玲、蒋凯

展开 >

北京大学社会科学部综合办公室(北京 100871)

北京大学教育学院

北京大学国际高等教育研究中心(北京 100871)

高校学术评价 人文社科 东亚 中国 日本 韩国

2020年度北京大学桐山教育基金

2024

世界教育信息
教育部教育管理信息中心

世界教育信息

影响因子:0.269
ISSN:1672-3937
年,卷(期):2024.37(10)