首页|"调督解郁法"电针治疗轻中度抑郁症的临床随机对照研究

"调督解郁法"电针治疗轻中度抑郁症的临床随机对照研究

扫码查看
目的 评价"调督解郁法"电针治疗轻中度抑郁症的临床疗效。方法 采用随机、单盲、平行对照设计,纳入抑郁症患者64人,按1∶1比例将患者分配到电针组和对照组。电针组取百会、神庭、印堂、内关、三阴交、合谷和太冲,电极连接百会、印堂,选择连续波型、频率2 Hz,每次治疗30 min,每周3次,共8周。对照组采用Streitberger不破皮安慰假针,取穴及疗程等与电针组相同,主要指标为汉密尔顿抑郁量表-17项(HAMD-17);次要指标包括抑郁症自评量表(PHQ-9)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)及健康调查简表(SF-36)。在治疗前、治疗后第4、8、12周随访时对患者进行相应指标评估。结果 电针组完成病例31例,对照组完成30例,总脱落率4。7%。采用意向性治疗分析原则,在治疗第4、8、12周时,电针组的HAMD-17评分均低于对照组(P<0。01)。两组患者HAMD-17评分均随时间变化而降低,但电针组下降趋势更明显。第8周时,电针组PHQ-9和SAS评分均显著小于对照组(P<0。01),在SF-36精力、社会功能和精神健康3个维度的评分均高于对照组(P<0。01)。结论 与假针刺相比,"调督解郁法"电针治疗能够更有效地改善轻中度抑郁症患者的抑郁情绪,缓解焦虑,并提升其生活质量。
Efficacy of the Electroacupuncture with"Regulating the Governor Vessel to Relieve Depression"Method in Treating Mild to Moderate Depression:A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture(EA)in the treatment of mild to moderate depression with the method of"Regulating the Governor Vessel to Relieve Depression".Methods In a randomized,single-blind,parallel-controlled design,64 patients with depression were enrolled and assigned to the EA group and the control group in a 1∶1 ratio.In the EA group,Baihui,Shenting,Yintang,Neiguan,Sanyinjiao,Hegu and Taichong were selected,electrodes were connected to Baihui and Yintang,continuous wave and frequency of 2 Hz were applied,and each session was given for 30 min,3 times a week for 8 weeks.The control group used Streitberger needles which couldn't be inserted into the skin,and the acupoints and treatment course were the same as the EA group.The primary outcome was the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(HAMD-17);secondary outcomes included the Patient Health Questionnaire(PHQ-9),the Self-rating Anxiety Scale(SAS)and the 36-item Short-form Health Survey(SF-36).Patients were assessed before treatment,at weeks 4 and 8 after treatment,and at the follow-up visit at week 12.Results 31 cases in the EA group finished the trial and 30 in the control group,with an overall dropout rate of 4.7%.Using the intention-to-treat analysis,patients'HAMD-17 scores in the EA group were lower than those in the control group at weeks 4,8 and 12 of treatment(P<0.01).HAMD-17 scores decreased over time in both groups,but the EA's downward trend was more pronounced.At week 8,compared with the control group,the PHQ-9 and SAS scores were lower in the EA group(P<0.01),the EA group scored higher on all 3 dimensions of SF-36,energy,social functioning and mental health(P<0.01).Conclusion Compared with sham acupuncture,the EA treatment was more effective in improving depression,relieving anxiety and improving the quality of life of patients with mild to moderate depression.

ElectroacupunctureDepressionHamilton depression rating scaleRandomized controlled trial

胥琨、殷萱、赵雯婷、吴焕淦、徐世芬

展开 >

上海中医药大学附属市中医医院 上海 200071

上海市长宁区天山中医医院 上海 200051

怒江州中医医院 泸水 673299

上海市针灸经络研究所 上海 200030

展开 >

电针 抑郁症 汉密尔顿抑郁量表 随机对照试验

2024

世界科学技术-中医药现代化
中科院科技政策与管理科学研究所,中国高技术产业发展促进会

世界科学技术-中医药现代化

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.175
ISSN:1674-3849
年,卷(期):2024.26(11)