刷单炒信行为的可罚性界定与罪名选择
The Definition of Punishment and The Choice of Charges for Click Farming
葛惟翰1
作者信息
- 1. 温州大学 法学院,浙江 温州 325035
- 折叠
摘要
刷单炒信行为损害了我国的市场经济秩序,然而学界关于刷单炒信行为是否具有刑事可罚性还有争论,在实践中,刷单炒信在罪名选择上存在困境.应当借鉴可罚的违法性理论,只有在"质"和"量"都满足刑事可罚条件的刷单炒信行为才具有刑事可罚性.在罪名选择上,不宜以"口袋罪"定罪量刑,应对刷单炒信行为做类型化处理,确立以侵害法益为主、手段行为为辅的定性原则,先根据侵害的主要法益认定为经济犯罪,对于不能评价为经济犯罪的刷单炒信行为根据手段行为认定为网络犯罪,维护市场竞争秩序.
Abstract
The act of scalping and speculation damages the market economic order of China,but there are still argu-ments in the academic field on whether the act of scalping and speculation is criminally punishable.In practice,there are difficulties in the choice of charges for scalping and speculation.We should draw lessons from the theory of punishable illegality.Only when both"quality"and"quantity"meet the conditions for criminal punishment can the act of writing orders and speculating letters be criminally punishable.On the choice of charges,it is not appropriate to conviction and sentencing the crime of"pocketing",and we should deal with the acts of scalping and speculation in types,establish the qualitative principle of mainly infringing upon legal interests and supplemented by means,first identify them as economic crimes according to the main legal interests of infringement,and then identify them as network crimes according to means that cannot be evaluated as economic crimes,so as to maintain the order of mar-ket competition.
关键词
刷单炒信行为/可罚的违法性/经济犯罪/网络犯罪Key words
the behavior of brushing orders and speculating on letters/punishable illegality/economic crimes/cyber-crime引用本文复制引用
基金项目
2023年度温州大学法学院"光正大"基金法学课题研究资助项目(FX20230104)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据