首页|水中碘化物的3种测定方法比较

水中碘化物的3种测定方法比较

扫码查看
目的:通过离子色谱法、硫酸铈催化分光光度法、电感耦合等离子体质谱法 3 种方法测定水中碘化物,通过实验比较,分析 3 种方法的优缺点.方法:选取质控样品作为实验对象,按照 3 种方法实验步骤测定各实验组水中碘化物浓度.结果:3 种检测方法线性关系均满足实际检测要求,且相关系数R2≥0.999.电感耦合等离子体质谱法检出限为 0.6 μg·L-1,加标回收率为 100.8%,相对标准偏差为 0.36%~0.45%;硫酸铈催化分光光度法检出限为 1.2 μg·L-1,加标回收率为 84.4%,相对标准偏差为0.80%~1.91%;离子色谱法检出限为8 μg·L-1,加标回收率为91.4%,相对标准偏差为0.23%~1.11%.结论:3 种检测方法检测范围广、灵敏度高,且精密度和准确度表现良好,均可准确测定水中碘化物的含量.
Comparison of Three Methods for Determination of Iodide in Water
Objective:To determine iodine content in water by ion chromatography,cerium sulfate catalytic spectrophotometry and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry,and to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the three methods through experimental comparison.Method:Quality control samples were selected as experimental objects,and the concentration of iodine in water of each experimental group was determined according to the experimental steps of the three methods.Result:The linear relationship of the three detection methods all meet the actual detection requirements,and the correlation coefficient R2≥0.999.The detection limit of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry was 0.6 μg·L-1,the spiked recovery rate was 100.8%,and RSD was 0.36%~0.45%.The detection limit of cerium sulfate catalytic spectrophotometry was 1.2 μg·L-1,the spiked recovery rate was 84.4%,and RSD was 0.80%~1.91%.The detection limit of ion chromatography was 8 μg·L-1,the spiked recovery rate was 91.4%,and RSD was 0.23%~1.11%.Conclusion:The three detection methods have a wide range of detection,high sensitivity,and good precision and accuracy,and can accurately determine the content of iodide in water.

iodideion chromatographycerium sulfate catalytic spectrophotometryinductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

董志梅、黄叶薇

展开 >

北海市供水有限责任公司,广西北海 536000

碘化物 离子色谱法 硫酸铈催化分光光度法 电感耦合等离子体质谱法

2024

食品安全导刊
商业科技质量中心 北京肉类食品协会

食品安全导刊

影响因子:0.065
ISSN:1674-0270
年,卷(期):2024.(6)
  • 6