首页|后侧微创入路内固定技术对肩胛骨骨折患者应用价值

后侧微创入路内固定技术对肩胛骨骨折患者应用价值

扫码查看
目的 探讨肩胛骨骨折患者治疗中后侧微创入路内固定技术的应用价值.方法 回顾性分析2018-08-01-2022-02-25长清区人民医院骨科(25例)及山东省立医院创伤骨科(15例)诊治的40例肩胛骨骨折患者的临床资料,依据内固定技术入路分为后侧微创入路组(观察组)、Judet传统入路组(对照组)各20例.统计分析2组患者围手术期指标、肩关节活动度、疼痛程度、臂肩手功能障碍、肩关节功能、日常生活能力、临床疗效、术后并发症发生情况和切口周围皮肤外观满意度.结果 观察组患者的切口长度(11.30±2.44)cm,短于对照组(28.02±4.51)cm,t=14.582,P<0.001;术中出血量(100.02±9.44)mL,少于对照组(420.03±9.12)mL,t=109.031,P<0.001;手术时间(86.42±11.45)min,短于对照组(120.56±9.86)min,t=14.290,P<0.001;骨折愈合时间(10.02±1.06)周,短于对照组(12.02±2.14)周,t=5.297,P<0.001.根据手术前基线数据调整,手术后2组患者的肩关节外展、外旋、水平内收、屈曲活动度均高于手术前,且观察组患者上述指标活动度均高于对照组,F值分别为11.200、11.028、12.211和12.139,均P<0.001.手术后,2组患者的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、臂肩手功能障碍(DASH)评分均低于手术前,Constant肩关节评分、日常生活能力量表(ADL)评分均高于手术前,观察组患者的VAS评分、DASH评分均低于对照组,Constant评分、ADL评分均高于对照组,F值分别为13.690、10.310、18.135和3.331,均P<0.001.观察组患者的肩关节功能恢复优良率为95.00%(19/20),高于对照组的75.00%(15/20),x2=6.275,P=0.012.观察组患者的术后并发症发生率为5.00%(1/20),低于对照组的20.00%(4/20),x2=4.114,P=0.043.观察组患者的切口周围皮肤外观满意度为95.00%(19/20),高于对照组的70.00%(14/20),x2=8.658,P=0.003.结论 肩胛骨骨折患者治疗中后侧微创入路内固定技术的应用效果优于Judet传统入路内固定术,可改善围手术期指标、疼痛程度和功能恢复,降低术后并发症,提高优良率和切口周围皮肤外观满意度.
Application value of posterior minimally invasive internal fixation technique in patients with scapular fractures
Objective To explore the application value of minimally invasive posterior approach internal fixation technology in the treatment of patients with scapular fractures.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 40 patients with scapular fractures treated in the Orthopedics Department of Changqing District People's Hospital(25 cases)and the Trauma Orthopedics Department of Shandong Provincial Hospital(15 cases)from August 1,2018 to Feb-ruary 25,2022.According to the internal fixation technique approach,the patients were divided into a posterior minimal-ly invasive approach group(observation group)and a Judet traditional approach group(control group),with 20 cases in each group.Statistical analysis of perioperative indicators,shoulder joint mobility,pain level,arm shoulder hand dys-function,shoulder joint function,daily living ability,clinical efficacy,incidence of postoperative complications,and satis-faction with the appearance of the skin around the incision in two groups of patients.Results The incision length of the observation group patients was(11.30±2.44)cm,which was shorter than that of the control group(28.02±4.51)cm,t=14.582,P<0.001.The intraoperative blood loss was(100.02±9.44)ml,which was less than that of the control group(420.03±9.12)ml,t=109.031,P<0.001.The operation time was(86.42±11.45)minutes,which was shor-ter than the control group's(120.56±9.86)minutes,t=14.290,P<0.001.The fracture healing time was(10.02±1.06)weeks,which was shorter than the control group's(12.02±2.14)week,t=5.297,P<0.001.After adjusting for baseline data before surgery,the shoulder joint abduction,external rotation,horizontal adduction,and flexion range of motion of both groups of patients were higher than before surgery,and the observation group had higher range of motion than the control group,with F-values of 11.200,11.028,12.211,and 12.139,respectively,all P<0.001.After sur-gery,the visual analogue scale(VAS)scores and disability of arm shoulder and hand(DASH)scores were lower in both groups of patients than before surgery,while the Constant shoulder joint score and activity of daily living scale(ADL score were higher than before surgery.The VAS score and DASH score of the observation group were lower than those of the control group,while the Constant score and ADL score were higher than those of the control group,with F-values of 13.690,10.310,18.135,and 3.331,respectively,all P<0.001.The excellent and good recovery rate of shoulder joint function in the observation group was 95.00%(19/20),which was higher than the 75.00%(15/20)in the control group,x2=6.275,P=0.012.The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was 5.00%(1/20),which was lower than the 20.00%(4/20)in the control group,x2=4.114,P=0.043.The satisfaction rate of the skin appearance around the incision in the observation group was 95.00%(19/20),which was higher than the 70.00%(14/20)in the control group,x2=8.658,P=0.003.Conclusion The application effect of minimally invasive posterior ap-proach internal fixation technology in the treatment of scapular fractures is superior to Judet's traditional approach internal fixation surgery,which can improve perioperative indicators,pain levels,and functional recovery,reduce postoperative complications,improve the rate of excellence and satisfaction with the appearance of the skin around the incision.

scapula fractureJudet traditional approachminimally invasive posterior approachinternal fixation technolo-gyshoulder joint range of motionshoulder joint function

朱纪辉、张磊、陈国庆、杨永良、王浩

展开 >

济南市长清区人民医院骨科,山东济南 250300

山东省立医院创伤骨科,山东济南 250021

肩胛骨骨折 Judet传统入路 后侧微创入路 内固定技术 肩关节活动度 肩关节功能

2024

社区医学杂志
中华预防医学会

社区医学杂志

影响因子:0.588
ISSN:1672-4208
年,卷(期):2024.22(18)