首页|知识产权惩罚性赔偿主观故意的认定分析

知识产权惩罚性赔偿主观故意的认定分析

扫码查看
《中华人民共和国民法典》(以下简称《民法典》)中将"故意"和"情节严重"作为侵害知识产权惩罚性赔偿适用的要件之一.在司法实践中,如何认定"故意"尚无统一、具体的标准,且存在"故意"概念模糊、难以证明的问题.为平衡各方利益,知识产权惩罚性赔偿在适用上需要厘清主观故意的认定标准,明确"故意"与"恶意"之间的关系,限定惩罚性赔偿在知识产权领域的适用范围.对知识产权惩罚性赔偿主观"故意"的认定予以明晰,不仅可以为知识产权惩罚性赔偿的适用提供合理依据,还可以完善知识产权惩罚性赔偿制度.
Analysis of the Determination of Subjective Intent of Punitive Damages for Intellectual Property Infringement
In the Civil Code,"intent"and"aggravating circumstances"are taken as one of the elements for the application of punitive damages for infringement of intellectual property rights.However,there is no uniform and specific standard on how to determine"intent"in judicial practice,and the concept of"intent"is vague and difficult to prove.In order to balance the interests of all parties,it is necessary to clarify the criteria for determining subjec-tive intent,make clear the relationship between"intent"and"malicious intent",and limit the scope of application of punitive damages in the field of intellectual property.Clarifying the determination of subjective"intent"of punitive damages for intellectual property infringement can not only provide a reasonable basis for the application of punitive damages for intellectual property infringements,but also can improve the system of punitive damages for infringe-ments of intellectual property rights.

infringement liabilitypunitive damagessubjective intentintellectual property rights

张赛涛

展开 >

华北水利水电大学 法学院,河南 郑州 450000

侵权责任 惩罚性赔偿 主观故意 知识产权

2024

商丘职业技术学院学报
商丘职业技术学院

商丘职业技术学院学报

影响因子:0.18
ISSN:1671-8127
年,卷(期):2024.23(6)