首页|自由与责任:康德与阿伦特论根本恶

自由与责任:康德与阿伦特论根本恶

扫码查看
康德和阿伦特都对恶的问题进行了深入思考,但对于二者根本恶概念之间的关系,学界尚未有详细的讨论.采用准先验分析进路,可以发现恶的形成既受到先天因素的影响,也与社会环境因素紧密相关.这一路径为深化对康德和阿伦特根本恶理论共通性的理解提供了一个有效的分析视角.基于此,对根本恶的分析应从经验性恶行出发,进而追溯到其更深层次的主观根据——人的 自由本性.阿伦特和康德的 自由概念在结构上具有相似性,二者在对根本恶的讨论中都十分关注人类的 自由本性与道德责任.阿伦特对康德根本恶理论继承与发展,为深刻理解恶的问题提供了新的视角和更广阔的理论维度.
Freedom and Responsibility:Kant and Arendt on Radical Evil
Kant and Arendt both conducted in-depth reflections on the problem of evil,yet a thorough examination of the relationship between their concepts of radical evil remains to be seen.The quasi-transcendental analytical approach reveals that the formation of evil is influenced not only by innate factors but also closely tied to social environmental factors.This approach provides an effective analytical pathway for deepening the common understanding of Kant's and Arendt's theories on radical evil.Based on this,the analysis of radical evil should start from acts of empirical evil,tracing back to its deeper subjective basis-the nature of freedom.Arendt and Kant exhibit structural similarities in their concepts of freedom.Both focus on human freedom and moral responsibility in the shared meaning of radical evil.Arendt's inheritance and development of Kant's theory of radical evil offer a new perspective and a broader theoretical dimension for a profound understanding of the problem of evil.

radical evilbanality of evilKantArendtfreedomquasi-transcendental path

杨金霖

展开 >

湖南师范大学中华伦理文明研究中心,湖南长沙 410081

根本恶 恶的平庸性 康德 阿伦特 自由 准先验路径

湖南省研究生科研创新项目

QL20230119

2024

上饶师范学院学报
上饶师范学院

上饶师范学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.147
ISSN:1004-2237
年,卷(期):2024.44(1)
  • 44