首页|中亚热带不同林龄木荷养分限制及重吸收特征

中亚热带不同林龄木荷养分限制及重吸收特征

扫码查看
氮磷重吸收是林木应对养分限制和提高养分利用效率而采取的重要养分利用策略。林木氮磷重吸收特征随其生长发育的变化规律和机制研究尚不充分。本文以中亚热带不同林龄(6、18、26和34年生)的木荷(Schima superba)人工林为研究对象,测定了木荷新鲜叶和衰老叶的氮(N)、磷(P)含量及其重吸收效率,并结合土壤全氮、全磷、铵态氮、硝态氮和速效磷含量,探究不同林龄木荷叶片养分重吸收特征及其调控机制。结果发现:土壤氮磷含量随林龄增长发生显著变化,6年生木荷林土壤全磷含量显著高于26和34年生木荷;26年生木荷林土壤全氮含量显著高于6、18和34年生木荷林土壤。34年生木荷新鲜叶全氮含量显著高于6、18和26年生木荷(P<0。05),不同生长阶段木荷新鲜叶全磷含量、衰老叶全氮和全磷含量均无显著差异(P>0。05)。木荷叶片氮重吸收效率(RN)随林龄增加而升高(35。48%~44。52%),均值为38。25%;而磷重吸收效率(RN)随林龄增加而降低(30。99%~53。50%),均值为40。42%;6和18年生木荷叶片的相对养分重吸收效率(RN∶Rp)小于1,26和34年生木荷叶片的相对养分重吸收效率大于1;4个林龄木荷叶片全磷含量均小于1 g·kg-1且全氮含量均小于20 g·kg-1,新鲜叶氮磷比随林龄显著增加(17。62~24。40)且大于16,表明该地区木荷生长受到磷限制。RN与土壤铵态氮、硝态氮以及氮磷比(STN∶STP)呈正相关;Rp与土壤速效磷呈正相关,与土壤铵态氮呈显著负相关(R2=0。332,P<0。05),RN∶Rp与土壤氮磷比呈显著正相关(R2=0。306,P<0。05)。研究结果表明,随着木荷生长发育,叶片氮重吸收效率增加,以满足生长发育的氮需求;但叶片磷重吸收效率降低,导致磷限制增强。可见,叶片磷重吸收可能不是其适应磷限制的主导机制,未来可深入研究木荷应对磷限制的其他途径,并进一步明确磷重吸收和土壤铵态氮含量变化的作用机制。
Nutrient limitation and resorption characteristics of different aged Schima superba plantations in central subtropical China
Nitrogen(N)and phosphorus(P)resorption is a key nutrient use strategy for trees to cope with nutrient limitation and improve nutrient use efficiency.The variation and mechanism of N and P resorption of trees with stand development are still unclear.In this study,we measured N and P concentrations of fresh and senescent leav-es of Schima superba across different stand ages(6,18,26 and 34 years old)in Nanping,Fujian Province,and calculated nutrient resorption efficiency.Combining with the concentrations of soil total N(STN),total P(STP),ammonium N,nitrate N and available P(AP),we further explored the regulation mechanism of nutrient resorption in S.superba leaves across different stand ages.The results showed that STN and STP concentrations changed signi-ficantly with increasing stand age.The STP concentration of 6-year-old plantation was significantly higher than that of 26-and 34-year-old plantations.The STN concentration of 26-year-old plantation was significantly higher than that of 6-,18-and 34-year-old plantations.With increasing stand age,TN concentration of fresh leaves in 34-year-old S.superba was significantly higher than that of 6-,18-and 26-year-old S.superba.There was no significant difference in TP concentration of fresh leaves,TN and TP concentrations of senescent leaves in different stand ages(P>0.05).Leaf N resorption efficiency(RN)increased with increasing stand age,ranging from 35.48%to 44.52%,with an average of 38.25%.Leaf P resorption efficiency(RP)decreased with increasing stand age,ran-ging from 30.99%to 53.50%,with an average of 40.42%.The relative resorption efficiency of N and P(RN∶Rp)of 6-and 18-year-old S.superba was less than 1,and that of 26-and 34-year-old S.superba was greater than 1.Fo-liar P and N concentrations of the four stands were less than 1 and 20 g·kg-1,respectively.The N/P in fresh lea-ves increased significantly with increasing stand age,ranging from 17.62-24.40 and greater than 16,indicating that the growth of S.superba was limited by P.Leaf RN was positively correlated with soil ammonium N,nitrate N and STN/STP ratio.Leaf Rp was positively correlated with soil available P concentration and negatively correlated with ammonium N(P<0.05).RN∶Rp was significantly positively correlated with STN/STP ratio(P<0.05),indicating a positive feedback mechanism between soil nutrient concentration and nutrient resorption.Our results showed that leaf RN increased to meet the N demand with the development of S.superba plantation.However,leaf Rp decreased,resulting in increased P limitation.It is indicated that P resorption may not be the dominant mechanism underlying its adaptation to P limitation.Other ways of S.superba to cope with P limitation,as well as the interaction mecha-nism of P resorption with changes in soil ammonium N concentration should be further studied.

Schima superbastand agenitrogen resorption efficiencyphosphorus resorption efficiencyphosphor-us limitation

程刘涛、郭文、王玉哲、吴晓生、严强、胡亚林、刘先

展开 >

福建农林大学林学院,福州 350002

福建农林大学西芹教学林场,福建南平 353001

木荷 林龄 氮重吸收效率 磷重吸收效率 磷限制

国家自然科学基金促进海峡两岸科技合作联合基金

U1805243

2024

生态学杂志
中国生态学学会

生态学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.439
ISSN:1000-4890
年,卷(期):2024.43(2)
  • 47