首页|认罪认罚从宽制度法律适用问题探究

认罪认罚从宽制度法律适用问题探究

扫码查看
自开展认罪认罚从宽试点改革以来,对是否应当降低此类案件的证明标准,理论界和实务界产生了一定的争议,特别是认罪认罚从宽制度与以审判为中心的关系、认罪认罚案件的证明标准、值班律师和量刑建议等诸多问题.为进一步科学规范贯彻落实认罪认罚从宽制度,当前审理被告人认罪认罚案件,应当坚持以审判为中心、补强证据来源于口供或同案被告人供述的要慎重、建立公设辩护人和政府购买法律服务两种模式、结合实际推行量刑建议分类精准模式,以切实推进我国法治化进程.
A Study of the Legal Application of the Leniency System for Admitting Guilt and Accepting Punishment
Since the launch of the pilot reform of the leniency of guilty pleas,there has been a certain amount of controversy in the theoretical and practical circles as to whether or not the standard of proof in such cases should be lowered,particularly with re-gard to the relationship between the leniency system of admitting guilt and accepting punishment and the trial-centered system,the standard of proof in cases of admitting guilt and accepting punishment,the duty counsel and the recommendation of sentencing and other issues.In order to further standardize and implement the leniency system for confessing guilt and accepting punishment in a scientific manner,the current trial of the defendant's confession and punishment case,should adhere to the trial as the center,to strengthen the evidence from the confession or co-defendant statements to be cautious,the establishment of two modes:public de-fenders and government procurement of legal services,combined with the practical implementation of the classification of sentenc-ing recommendations accurate mode,in order to effectively promote the process of China's rule of law.

admitting guilt and accepting punishmenttrial-centeredstandard of proofduty counselsentencing recommenda-tions

李金哲、李明华

展开 >

四川师范大学法学院,四川成都 610068

认罪认罚 以审判为中心 证明标准 值班律师 量刑建议

2024

山西大同大学学报(社会科学版)
山西大同大学

山西大同大学学报(社会科学版)

影响因子:0.166
ISSN:1674-0882
年,卷(期):2024.38(1)
  • 4