扰乱国家机关工作秩序罪与寻衅滋事罪适用实证分析
An Empirical Analysis of the Application of the Crimes of Disrupting the Work Order of State Organs and Causing Trouble
贺炬 1陆凌1
作者信息
- 1. 广西大学法学院,广西南宁 530000
- 折叠
摘要
由于立法上部分构成要件重合、相似,扰乱国家机关工作秩序罪与寻衅滋事罪的适用极易混同.通过实证分析586份裁判文书发现:首先,法院对扰乱国家机关工作秩序罪所侵害法益的定性模糊,扰乱国家机关工作秩序罪中的国家机关工作秩序和寻衅滋事罪公共场所秩序的法益区分不明显;其次,扰乱国家机关工作秩序罪与强拿硬要、起哄闹事型寻衅滋事罪行为方式、外观高度重合.因此,区分两罪也要从法益和行为方式入手,并参考寻衅滋事罪的主观违法要素进行区分.
Abstract
Due to the overlap and similarity of some constituent elements in legislation,the application of the crime of disrupt-ing the work order of state organs and the crime of causing trouble is easily confused.Through empirical analysis of 586 judicial doc-uments,it was found that:firstly,the court's characterization of the legal interests infringed upon by the crime of disrupting the work order of state organs is vague,and the legal interests of the crime of disrupting the work order of state organs and the crime of provoking trouble in public places are not clearly distinguished;Secondly,the crime of disrupting the work order of state organs highly overlaps with the behavior and appearance of the crime of forcefully demanding and provoking trouble.Therefore,distin-guishing between the two crimes should also start from legal interests and behavior methods,and refer to the subjective illegal ele-ments of the crime of causing trouble to distinguish.
关键词
扰乱国家机关工作秩序罪/寻衅滋事罪/法益/行为方式/主观违法要素Key words
crimes of disrupting the working order of state organs/the crime of causing trouble/legal interest/behavior/subjec-tive element of illegality引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据