首页|数字赋能抑或数字负能:数字乡村治理的双重效应与内在机理

数字赋能抑或数字负能:数字乡村治理的双重效应与内在机理

扫码查看
在国家数字乡村建设政策指导下,技术工具是提升乡村治理效能的重要抓手.数字技术赋能乡村治理的同时,亦导致了"数字负能"的治理后果.通过建构"技术—制度—参与"分析框架,探索数字乡村治理中数字赋能与数字负能的内在逻辑.研究发现,数字技术在嵌入乡村治理过程中具有双重效应:一方面,数字技术嵌入可以促进乡村治理模式嬗变、秩序结构逐渐规范、民众有序参与治理;另一方面,信息壁垒封锁、考评机制失衡以及供需配置失调是诱发数字工作繁复、数字形式主义、数字技术悬浮等数字负能现象产生的关键因素.研究表明,应坚持以人民为中心的宗旨,从加强技术规训和批判、适度调整制度和优化实践参与等方面共同发力,消弭数字负能.
Digital Empowerment or Disempowerment:The Dual Effects and Internal Mechanism of Digital Rural Governance
Under the guidance of the national policy on digital village construction,technical tools serve as crucial levers to enhance the effectiveness of rural governance.While digital technology empowers rural governance,it also results in the consequence of"digital disempowerment".This paper explores the internal logic of digital empowerment and disempowerment in digital rural governance by constructing an analytical framework of"Technology-Institution-Participation".The study suggests that digital technology may have dual effects when applied in rural governance.On the one hand,its application can facilitate the evolution of rural governance models,the gradual normalization of order and structures,and promote orderly public participation in governance.On the other hand,information barriers,imbalanced evaluation mechanisms,and mismatched supply and demand are key factors that induce manifestations of digital disempowerment,such as cumbersome digital workloads,digital formalism,and detachment of digital technology from practical needs.The study indicates that,to resolve the paradox of digital disempowerment,efforts should be made to strengthen technological discipline and critique,moderately adjust institutions,and optimize practical participation by adhering to the people-centered principle.

Digital Rural GovernanceDigital EmpowermentDigital Disempowerment"Technology-Institution-Participation"

曾凡军、余航、杨舜清

展开 >

广西大学 公共管理学院,广西 南宁 530004

数字乡村治理 数字赋能 数字负能 "技术—制度—参与"

2025

三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版)
三峡大学

三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版)

影响因子:0.469
ISSN:1672-6219
年,卷(期):2025.47(1)