首页|中外数学教科书"用圆弧表示角"本质的比较研究

中外数学教科书"用圆弧表示角"本质的比较研究

扫码查看
中小学数学教科书中用圆弧表示角的方式尚未统一,无法凸显角的本质,主要原因在于"用圆弧表示角"的本质尚不明确."用圆弧表示角"的本质为:用圆弧长度(圆弧所对半径相等)表示角的大小;带有方向(箭头)的圆弧,既可表示角的方向,也可表示角的优劣.对中国近百年(15个版本)教科书的比较发现:"用圆弧表示角"的编排逐渐统一,但角的静态定义不利于体现"用圆弧表示角"的本质;对"圆弧所对半径相等"的认识仍不清晰.国外教科书的情况也大致相同.提出建议:早早引入角的动态定义,统一圆弧所对半径,凸显角的本质.
A Comparative Study on the Essence of"Representation of Angle with Arc"in Chinese and Foreign Mathematics Textbooks
Representation of Angle with arc in primary and secondary school mathematics textbooks has not been unified,and the essence of angle cannot be highlighted.The main reason is that the essence of"using arcs to represent angles"is still unclear.The essence of"using arc to represent angle"is as follows:arc length(the radius of the arc is equal)represents angle size;the arc with a direction(arrow)can represent both the direction of the angle and the minor and reflex angle.A comparison of Chinese textbooks over the past century(15 versions)found that the arrangement of"representation of angle with arc"has gradually become unified,but the static definition of angle is not conducive to reflecting the essence;it is still not clear that the radius of the arc is equal.The situation of foreign textbooks is roughly the same.The following suggestions are put forward:introduce the dynamic definition of angles early,unify the radius of arc,and highlight the essence of angle.

representation of angle with arcessence of angletextbooks comparison

巩子坤、田荣飞

展开 >

杭州师范大学 经亨颐教育学院,浙江 杭州 310036

浙江省杭州市十三中教育集团,浙江 杭州 310012

用圆弧表示角 角的本质 教科书比较

浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题浙江省高校重大人文社科攻关计划

23NDJC265YB2023GH005

2024

数学教育学报
天津师范大学 中国教育学会

数学教育学报

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:2.296
ISSN:1004-9894
年,卷(期):2024.33(4)
  • 7