首页|添加不同来源养分对椰糠基质育苗效果的改良评价

添加不同来源养分对椰糠基质育苗效果的改良评价

扫码查看
[目的]适宜基质对培育优质秧苗有重要意义,目前常用的泥炭为主的基质对生态环境造成了严重的压力,探寻适宜的泥炭替代材料迫在眉睫。椰糠被视为具有替代泥炭潜力的物料,但其自身养分较难满足作物幼苗生长需求,探索不同来源养分对椰糠的养分补充效果,有助于增加椰糠在基质中作用、降低泥炭在基质中的比重。[方法]将10%珍珠岩、30%泥炭、50%椰糠分别与10%的猪粪有机肥(T1)、腐熟稻壳(T2)或农用腐殖酸(T3)3种养分源配制形成3种育苗基质,以"90%泥炭+10%珍珠岩"(CK1)和"30%泥炭+60%椰糠+10%珍珠岩"(CK2)为2个对照组,分别开展黄瓜和水稻的育苗试验。通过测定黄瓜和水稻的生长状况、育苗基质的理化性质和育苗基质的配制成本,评价不同来源养分对椰糠基质育苗的改良效果。同时邀请10位长期从事农业实际生产的技术人员对基质和幼苗生长状况进行评价打分,从农业实际角度验证最佳优选配方。[结果]本研究所采用的3种基质配方在种子萌发方面均具有良好效果,各处理的发芽指数均超过了100%。3种养分原料对于育苗基质的物理性质影响有限,但显著影响了育苗基质的化学性质,其中添加腐熟稻壳处理的pH最高,比CK1的pH高15。79%,添加腐熟稻壳和添加农用腐殖酸处理的EC最高,比CK1的EC高7。41%。经过对幼苗生长的综合评价,在黄瓜幼苗的生长状况方面,3种养分原料相对于CK2处理均实现了显著的改良,其中T1处理在株高、茎粗、叶绿素含量和地上部干重指标方面相对于CK1处理分别显著高出了16。99%、30。06%、18。13%和28。57%。在水稻幼苗的生长状况方面,添加猪粪有机肥和农用腐殖酸处理相对于CK1和CK2处理均实现了显著的改良效果,添加腐熟稻壳处理同CK2处理之间无显著差异。添加猪粪有机肥处理能同时实现黄瓜和水稻幼苗的最佳生长,但其配制成本相比其它处理也最高为0。54元/L,比CK1处理配制成本(0。47元/L)高14。89%。经过农业技术人员评价打分,农户对CK1处理和添加猪粪有机肥处理所代表的基质配方在黄瓜和水稻的育苗过程中表现出了最强的使用意愿。[结论]配方为"10%猪粪有机肥+30%泥炭+50%椰糠+10%珍珠岩"的基质能够同时满足黄瓜和水稻幼苗的生长需求。
Improved evaluation of seedling cultivation efficiency in cocopeat substrate through the addition of di-verse nutrient sources
[Objective]Suitable substrates are crucial for cultivating high-quality seedlings.Common peat-based substrates exert significant pressure on the ecological environment,necessitating the search for suitable alternatives.Coconut coir is a promising substitute for peat,but its limited nutrient content cannot fully meet crop seedling growth requirements.This study aimed to ex-plore the effects of different nutrient sources on enhancing coconut coir-based substrate to reduce peat usage.[Methods]Three seedling substrates were formulated using 10%organic pig manure,fermented rice husks,or agricultural humic acid as nutrient sources,combined with 10%perlite,30%peat,and 50%coconut coir.Two control groups,CK1(90%peat+10%perlite)and CK2(30%peat+60%coconut coir+10%perlite),were used in cucumber and rice seedling experiments.Measurements included seedling growth conditions,physical and chemical properties of the substrates,and formulation costs.Additionally,10 agricultural technicians evaluated and scored the substrates and seedling growth to identify the optimal formula from an agricul-tural perspective.[Results]All three substrate formulations showed excellent seed germination performance,with germination indices exceeding 100%.While the nutrient sources had limited effects on the substrates'physical properties,they significantly impacted chemical properties.The substrate with fermented rice husks exhibited the highest pH,15.79%higher than CK1,and the fermented rice husks and agricultural humic acid treatment achieved the highest EC,7.41%higher than CK1.Compre-hensive seedling growth evaluation showed that all three nutrient treatments significantly improved cucumber seedling growth compared to CK2.The T1 treatment(10%pig manure)led to increases of 16.99%,30.06%,18.13%,and 28.57%in plant height,stem diameter,chlorophyll content,and above-ground dry weight,respectively,compared to CK1.For rice seedlings,pig manure and agricultural humic acid treatments significantly outperformed CK1 and CK2,whereas the fermented rice husk treatment showed no significant difference compared to CK2.The pig manure treatment promoted optimal growth for both cucumber and rice seedlings,though its formulation cost was the highest at 0.54 yuan/L,14.89%higher than CK1(0.47 yuan/L).Farmer evaluations indicated a strong preference for CK1 and the pig manure treatments during seedling cultivation for both crops.[Conclusion]The substrate formulation"10%organic fertilizer from pig manure+30%peat+50%cocopeat+10%perlite"effectively meets the growth requirements of cucumber and rice seedlings.

CocopeatSeedling substrateVegetablesRiceExpert scoring method

魏然杰、池华聚、廉伟洪、刘铮、刘欣宇

展开 >

山东省沂水县龙家圈街道农业综合服务中心,山东 沂水,276405

新疆理工学院 经济管理学院,新疆 阿克苏,843100

长春大学 园林学院,吉林 长春,130000

辽宁省农业科学院 农村经济研究所,辽宁 沈阳,110161

中国农业大学有机循环研究院(苏州),江苏 苏州,215100

苏州市上辽现代农业发展有限公司,江苏 苏州,215335

展开 >

椰糠 育苗基质 蔬菜 水稻 专家评分法

2025

山西农业大学学报(自然科学版)
山西农业大学

山西农业大学学报(自然科学版)

北大核心
影响因子:0.461
ISSN:1671-8151
年,卷(期):2025.45(1)