国家、社会与宗族:1928-1930年拥孔派对曲阜林庙改革的回应
State、Society and Clan:The response of Confucius supporters to the reform of Qufu Lin Temple from 1928 to 1930
成积春 1王凯2
作者信息
- 1. 曲阜师范大学历史文化学院
- 2. 曲阜师范大学教育学院
- 折叠
摘要
1928年,大学院颁布《废止春秋祀孔旧典的通令》,一些激进派将孔府斥为"封建余孽"和"反革命",要求没收其"逆产",由此招致拥孔派的驳斥,但是由于特殊的时代背景及某些制度因素影响,激进派在1928-1930年始终左右着曲阜林庙改革的制度进程.最终,在蔡元培等人的促动下,颇为激进的《审查改革曲阜林庙办法报告》在国家政制层面得以"实现".虽然制度层面的博弈以拥孔派的"落败"而告终,但是各种拥孔活动仍在持续进行,并致使《改革曲阜林庙办法》陷入"暂缓执行"的尴尬境地.与激进派的"价值虚无"和"情绪化"相比,拥孔派的回应则较为理性和现实,透过其思想主张,我们可以对当时的背景、儒家文化之实态及其价值问题有更加深刻的认知.
Abstract
In 1928,University College promulgated the"General Decree on the Abolition of the Old Confucian Canon in the Spring and Autumn Period",and some radicals denounced Confucius as a"feudal remnant"and a"counter-revolutionary",and demanded the confiscation of its"reverse property",which attracted the refutation of the pro-Confucian faction,but due to the special background of the times and the influence of some institutional factors,the radicals always controlled the institutional process of the reform of Qufu Lin Temple from 1928 to 1930.In the end,under the impetus of Cai Yuanpei and others,the radical"Report on the Review and Reform of Qufu Lin Temple Measures"was"realized"at the national political level.Although the game at the institutional level ended with the"defeat"of the pro-Confucian faction,various pro-Confucian activities continued,and caused the"Measures for Reforming Qufu Lin Temple"to fall into the embarrassing situation of"suspending implementation".Compared with the"value nihilism"and"emotionality"of the radicals,the response of the pro-Confucian faction was more rational and realistic,and through its ideological propositions,we can have a deeper understanding of the background of the time,the reality of Confucian culture,and its value issues.
关键词
曲阜/林庙改革/拥孔派/回应/儒学价值Key words
Qufu/Forest Temple Reform/Pro-Confucius/Response/Confucian values引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据